Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] arm_mpam: change error IRQ to use a threaded IRQ handler
Ben Horgan <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:23:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Andre, On 7/29/26 14:41, Andre Przywara wrote: > When an MPAM MSC gets into an error condition, it can trigger an error > IRQ. We cannot really do much about those errors, but we at least query > and log the error, then disable MPAM functionality. > > This error report relies on reading the MSC's error status register > (ESR) in the IRQ handler, which is not possible for MPAM-Fb based > MSC accesses, since they involve mailbox routines that might sleep. > The same is true for clearing the interrupt at the source, which > requires an MSC access as well. > > Change the error IRQ to use a threaded IRQ handler, with an empty hard > IRQ routine, and doing all the MSC accesses (to access the status and > disable the IRQ line) in the threaded part. The change is minimal, we > just check for the first MSC access error and bail out early. > Also forbid per-CPU interrupts (PPIs) for MPAM-Fb, as we cannot use a > threaded IRQ here. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c > index abe1e628928f..e535603d2c7d 100644 > --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c > +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c > @@ -2659,9 +2659,11 @@ static int mpam_disable_msc_ecr(void *_msc) > return 0; > } > > +/* threaded IRQ handler for shared IRQs, to allow MPAM-Fb accesses to sleep */ This comment seems incomplete. The same handler is used for the PPI hardirq. > static irqreturn_t __mpam_irq_handler(int irq, struct mpam_msc *msc) > { > u64 reg; > + int ret; > u16 partid; > u8 errcode, pmg, ris; > > @@ -2670,13 +2672,19 @@ static irqreturn_t __mpam_irq_handler(int irq, struct mpam_msc *msc) > &msc->accessibility))) > return IRQ_NONE; > > - mpam_msc_read_esr(msc, ®); > + ret = mpam_msc_read_esr(msc, ®); This is also called for MMIO accesses and the checks in the reads and writes call smp_processor_id() which will give warnings if we are preemptible. There is also a similar to check higher up in this handler. We need to choose in what context we call things based on whether we are using MMIO accesses or MPAM-Fb. Thanks, Ben > + if (ret) { > + pr_err_ratelimited("unknown error irq from msc:%u\n", msc->id); > + > + /* Try out best here ... */ > + goto out_disable; > + } > > errcode = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_ESR_ERRCODE, reg); > if (!errcode) > return IRQ_NONE; > > - /* Clear level triggered irq */ > + /* Clear level triggered irq. Ignore errors, we need to proceed. */ > mpam_msc_clear_esr(msc); > > partid = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_ESR_PARTID_MON, reg); > @@ -2687,19 +2695,19 @@ static irqreturn_t __mpam_irq_handler(int irq, struct mpam_msc *msc) > msc->id, mpam_errcode_names[errcode], partid, pmg, > ris); > > - /* Disable this interrupt. */ > +out_disable: > + /* Disable this interrupt. Ignore errors, we need to proceed anyway. */ > mpam_disable_msc_ecr(msc); > > - /* Are we racing with the thread disabling MPAM? */ > - if (!mpam_is_enabled()) > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > - > /* > - * Schedule the teardown work. Don't use a threaded IRQ as we can't > - * unregister the interrupt from the threaded part of the handler. > + * Schedule the teardown work. We have to defer it as we can't > + * unregister the interrupt from the threaded part of a handler. > + * Check whether we are racing with the thread disabling MPAM. > */ > - mpam_disable_reason = "hardware error interrupt"; > - schedule_work(&mpam_broken_work); > + if (mpam_is_enabled()) { > + mpam_disable_reason = "hardware error interrupt"; > + schedule_work(&mpam_broken_work); > + } > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > @@ -2735,6 +2743,11 @@ static int mpam_register_irqs(void) > /* The MPAM spec says the interrupt can be SPI, PPI or LPI */ > /* We anticipate sharing the interrupt with other MSCs */ > if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) { > + if (msc->iface != MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) { > + dev_err(&msc->pdev->dev, > + "Only MMIO MSCs can use per-CPU interrupts\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > err = request_percpu_irq(irq, &mpam_ppi_handler, > "mpam:msc:error", > msc->error_dev_id); > @@ -2746,9 +2759,10 @@ static int mpam_register_irqs(void) > &_enable_percpu_irq, &irq, > true); > } else { > - err = devm_request_irq(&msc->pdev->dev, irq, > - &mpam_spi_handler, IRQF_SHARED, > - "mpam:msc:error", msc); > + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&msc->pdev->dev, irq, > + NULL, &mpam_spi_handler, > + IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT, > + "mpam:msc:error", msc); > if (err) > return err; > }