Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] ACPI: CPPC: Skip desired_perf read in cppc_get_perf()
Zhongqiu Han <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 20:38:51 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/29/2026 6:02 PM, Christian Loehle wrote:
> ACPI 6.6 changed the Optional Attribute of Desired Performance from
> Read/Write to Write. cppc_get_perf() nevertheless reads the register when
> initializing performance controls, even though cppc-cpufreq overwrites the
> value before using it.
>
> Use the readability check from cppc_get_desired_perf() and leave
> desired_perf zero instead of reading it on ACPI 6.6 or later. Also exclude
> the register from PCC read-command detection so it cannot trigger an
> otherwise unnecessary read command.
>
> Fixes: 658fa7b1c47a ("ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Suggested-by: Zhongqiu Han <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <[email protected]>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index 6e5381f8de38..210988d57b71 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -1843,6 +1843,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> u64 desired_perf = 0, min = 0, max = 0, energy_perf = 0, auto_sel = 0;
> int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu);
> struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL;
> + bool read_desired_perf = cppc_desired_perf_readable();
> int ret = 0, regs_in_pcc = 0;
>
> if (!cpc_desc) {
> @@ -1862,7 +1863,8 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> auto_sel_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE];
>
> /* Are any of the regs PCC ?*/
> - if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) ||
> + if ((read_desired_perf && CPC_IN_PCC(desired_perf_reg)) ||
> + CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) ||
> CPC_IN_PCC(max_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(energy_perf_reg) ||
> CPC_IN_PCC(auto_sel_reg)) {
> if (pcc_ss_id < 0) {
> @@ -1894,7 +1896,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> }
> perf_ctrls->min_perf = min;
>
> - if (CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_perf_reg)) {
> + if (read_desired_perf && CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_perf_reg)) {
> ret = cpc_read(cpu, desired_perf_reg, &desired_perf);
> if (ret)
> goto out_err;
--
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han