Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] arm_mpam: Add MPAM-Fb firmware support
Andre Przywara <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:32:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ben, On 7/30/26 19:10, Ben Horgan wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 7/30/26 16:25, Andre Przywara wrote: > [...] >> The first six patches rework all MSC access wrappers to propagate error >> information. Pure MMIO based MSC accesses would never fail, but the >> MPAM-Fb access can go wrong in multiple ways. The patches have been split >> up purely for reviewing reasons, if the number is a problem, we could as >> well squash them. Please note that until the very last patch of this series >> any MSC accesses would always only return 0, it's only the final enablement >> of MPAM-Fb that could possibly introduce errors. Hence all former patches >> can add error handling gradually, those code paths wouldn't be triggered >> before patch 10/10. > > I had a go at injecting some errors and noticed that at least some aren't getting to user space. > When writing the schemata file any MPAM-Fb error is not propagated to the user. The > resctrl_arch_update_domains() continues to return 0 as there are some missing links in the chain > down to the writes, e.g. __write_config() always returns 0. Ah yeah, that's true. With the write functions using a compatible prototype (just ignoring the new return value) this is harder to check, since the compiler is just fine with it. So I propagate all MSC access errors now in mpam_reprogram_ris_partid(), and the depending mpam_apply_config(), __write_config and mpam_reset_ris() functions. From my quick analysis I'd say that covers all functions now that mpam_devices.c exports. That will be a new patch 07/11. Cheers, Andre