Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ACPI: CPPC: Skip desired_perf read in cppc_get_perf()
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 16:43:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0hiqqHr13GEdTVk3E7KypNe1JEfwCZxMfPrRueOL5hEHg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 12:03=E2=80=AFPM Christian Loehle <[email protected]> wrote: > > ACPI 6.6 changed the Optional Attribute of Desired Performance from > Read/Write to Write. cppc_get_perf() nevertheless reads the register when > initializing performance controls, even though cppc-cpufreq overwrites th= e > value before using it. IMV it would be better to say that the change from R/W to W happened between _CPC rev 3 (in ACPI 6.5) and _CPC rev 4 (in ACPI 6.6). It would also be better to refer to the _CPC revision in the paragraph belo= w. > Use the readability check from cppc_get_desired_perf() and leave > desired_perf zero instead of reading it on ACPI 6.6 or later. Also exclud= e > the register from PCC read-command detection so it cannot trigger an > otherwise unnecessary read command. > > Fixes: 658fa7b1c47a ("ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read perform= ance controls") > Cc: [email protected] > Suggested-by: Zhongqiu Han <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > index 6e5381f8de38..210988d57b71 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > @@ -1843,6 +1843,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *= perf_ctrls) > u64 desired_perf =3D 0, min =3D 0, max =3D 0, energy_perf =3D 0, = auto_sel =3D 0; > int pcc_ss_id =3D per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu); > struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data =3D NULL; > + bool read_desired_perf =3D cppc_desired_perf_readable(); > int ret =3D 0, regs_in_pcc =3D 0; > > if (!cpc_desc) { > @@ -1862,7 +1863,8 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *= perf_ctrls) > auto_sel_reg =3D &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE]; > > /* Are any of the regs PCC ?*/ > - if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) || > + if ((read_desired_perf && CPC_IN_PCC(desired_perf_reg)) || > + CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) || > CPC_IN_PCC(max_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(energy_perf_reg) || > CPC_IN_PCC(auto_sel_reg)) { > if (pcc_ss_id < 0) { > @@ -1894,7 +1896,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *= perf_ctrls) > } > perf_ctrls->min_perf =3D min; > > - if (CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_perf_reg)) { > + if (read_desired_perf && CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_perf_reg)) { > ret =3D cpc_read(cpu, desired_perf_reg, &desired_perf); > if (ret) > goto out_err; > -- > 2.34.1 >