Re: [PATCH v7 11/11] arm_mpam: detect and enable MPAM-Fb PCC support
Andre Przywara <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 16:53:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 8/3/26 15:37, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Srivathsa, > > On 8/3/26 12:49, Srivathsa L Rao wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> On 7/31/2026 10:33 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> The Arm MPAM-Fb specification [1] describes a protocol to access MSC >>> registers through a firmware interface. This requires a shared memory >>> region to hold the message, and a mailbox to trigger the access. >>> For ACPI this is wrapped as a PCC channel, described using existing >>> ACPI abstractions. >>> >>> Add code to parse those PCC table descriptions associated with an MSC, >>> and store the parsed information in the MSC struct. >>> There can be multiple PCC channels, and each channel can serve multiple >>> MSCs, so we need to keep track of the channel usage, using a list and >>> a refcount. >>> >>> This will be used by the MPAM-Fb access wrapper code. >>> >>> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0144/latest >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]> >>> Tested-by: Ritwick Sharma <[email protected]> >>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c | 41 ++++++++++++ >>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 2 + >>> 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/ >>> mpam_devices.c >>> index b238feb559d4..40b247a89f8e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c >>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c >>> @@ -19,14 +19,19 @@ >>> #include <linux/irqdesc.h> >>> #include <linux/list.h> >>> #include <linux/lockdep.h> >>> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h> >>> #include <linux/mutex.h> >>> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >>> #include <linux/printk.h> >>> +#include <linux/property.h> >>> #include <linux/srcu.h> >>> #include <linux/spinlock.h> >>> #include <linux/types.h> >>> #include <linux/workqueue.h> >>> +#include <acpi/pcc.h> >>> +#include <acpi/acpi_io.h> >>> + >>> #include "mpam_internal.h" >>> /* Values for the T241 errata workaround */ >>> @@ -49,6 +54,88 @@ static LIST_HEAD(mpam_all_msc); >>> struct srcu_struct mpam_srcu; >>> +/* PCC channels might be serving multiple MSCs, so keep a refcounted >>> list. */ >>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcc_chan_list_lock); >>> +static LIST_HEAD(pcc_chan_list); >>> + >>> +static void mpam_pcc_chan_release(struct kref *ref) >>> +{ >>> + struct mpam_pcc_chan *cur = container_of(ref, struct mpam_pcc_chan, >>> + refcount); >>> + >>> + pcc_mbox_free_channel(cur->pcc_chan); >>> + list_del(&cur->pcc_chans); >>> + mutex_destroy(&cur->pcc_chan_lock); >>> + kfree(cur); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static struct mpam_pcc_chan *mpam_pcc_chan_get(struct device *dev, >>> + int subspace_id) >>> +{ >>> + struct mpam_pcc_chan *cur; >>> + >>> + guard(mutex)(&pcc_chan_list_lock); >>> + >>> + list_for_each_entry(cur, &pcc_chan_list, pcc_chans) { >>> + if (cur->subspace_id == subspace_id) { >>> + kref_get(&cur->refcount); >>> + >>> + return cur; >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> + cur = kzalloc_obj(*cur); >>> + if (!cur) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> + >>> + cur->pcc_cl.dev = dev; >> >> While testing v7 with multiple PCC MSCs sharing a single PCC channel, I >> noticed that pcc_cl.dev is set once at channel creation time (from the >> first MSC's device) and never updated when subsequent MSCs reuse the >> channel.In mpam_pcc_chan_get(), the first call sets: >> cur->pcc_cl.dev = dev; >> >> Subsequent calls return the existing channel without updating >> pcc_cl.dev. Here dev_err() calls through the channel report errors >> against the first MSC's device, even when a different MSC triggered them. > > Mmh, that's true, but I don't think there is much we can do about it? > Ultimately it's a channel shared between multiple devices. > And I am less concerned about our own dev_err() (we can easily - and > actually should - replace this with pr_err()), but more about the mbox > uses of the dev pointer. Did you by any chance find more critical users > of the dev pointer other than dev_err() prints, in the mailbox code? To answer my own question: I could only find code using the dev pointer during initialisation, to attribute the error messages to the right device. Which means when we drop the single usage in mpam_fb.c, there should be no more problems. Fixed that accordingly. Cheers, Andre > I don't know if the correct MSC attribution really matters, or if we can > live with just a valid reference to some "related" device, but ... > >> I reproduced this with four PCC MSCs sharing subspace 0. After unbinding >> the first MSC (kref 4→3), triggering dev_err() via a test hook showed >> the device prefix change from "mpam_msc mpam_msc.1:" to "platform >> mpam_msc.1:" > > Mmmh, interesting, where does the change come from? I would think that > would result in a use after free? > Which means we should make sure that some other MSC donates their dev > pointer if the first MSC goes away? I will have a look into that > direction, though it still feels a bit odd. > >> A simple fix maybe to use the MSC's own device for error messages in >> mpam_fb_send_request() instead of pcc_chan->pcc_cl.dev > > But we don't have that pointer at this time, do we? But as mentioned, > we could just revert to a simple pr_err() instead. > > Thanks for the heads up anyway! > Cheers, > Andre > > >> >>> + cur->pcc_cl.tx_block = true; >>> + >>> + cur->pcc_chan = pcc_mbox_request_channel(&cur->pcc_cl, >>> subspace_id); >>> + if (IS_ERR(cur->pcc_chan)) { >>> + long err = PTR_ERR(cur->pcc_chan); >>> + >>> + kfree(cur); >>> + return ERR_PTR(err); >>> + } >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * Timeout based on the "nominal latency" in us, from the >>> + * PCC ACPI table. tx_tout is in ms. >>> + * Add some margin here to be on the safe side. >>> + */ >>> + cur->pcc_cl.tx_tout = DIV_ROUND_UP(cur->pcc_chan->latency * 5, >>> 1000); >>> + >>> + mutex_init(&cur->pcc_chan_lock); >>> + >>> + cur->subspace_id = subspace_id; >>> + kref_init(&cur->refcount); >>> + >>> + list_add_tail(&cur->pcc_chans, &pcc_chan_list); >>> + >>> + return cur; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static int mpam_pcc_chan_put(struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan) >>> +{ >>> + struct mpam_pcc_chan *cur, *tmp; >>> + >>> + if (!pcc_chan) >>> + return 0; >>> + >>> + guard(mutex)(&pcc_chan_list_lock); >>> + >>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, &pcc_chan_list, pcc_chans) { >>> + if (cur == pcc_chan) { >>> + kref_put(&cur->refcount, mpam_pcc_chan_release); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> + return -ENOENT; >>> +} >>> + >>> /* >>> * Number of MSCs that have been probed. Once all MSCs have been >>> probed MPAM >>> * can be enabled. >>> @@ -2274,6 +2361,8 @@ static void mpam_msc_drv_remove(struct >>> platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> struct mpam_msc *msc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >>> + mpam_pcc_chan_put(msc->pcc_chan); >>> + >>> mutex_lock(&mpam_list_lock); >>> mpam_msc_destroy(msc); >>> mutex_unlock(&mpam_list_lock); >>> @@ -2284,7 +2373,7 @@ static void mpam_msc_drv_remove(struct >>> platform_device *pdev) >>> static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct >>> platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> int err; >>> - u32 tmp; >>> + u32 pcc_subspace_id; >>> struct mpam_msc *msc; >>> struct resource *msc_res; >>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >>> @@ -2328,7 +2417,7 @@ static struct mpam_msc >>> *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> if (err) >>> return ERR_PTR(err); >>> - if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "pcc-channel", &tmp)) >>> + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "pcc-channel", &pcc_subspace_id)) >>> msc->iface = MPAM_IFACE_MMIO; >>> else >>> msc->iface = MPAM_IFACE_PCC; >>> @@ -2349,6 +2438,26 @@ static struct mpam_msc >>> *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> } >>> msc->mapped_hwpage_sz = msc_res->end - msc_res->start; >>> msc->mapped_hwpage = io; >>> + } else if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_PCC) { >>> + msc->pcc_chan = mpam_pcc_chan_get(dev, pcc_subspace_id); >>> + if (IS_ERR(msc->pcc_chan)) { >>> + pr_err("Failed to request MSC PCC channel\n"); >>> + return ERR_CAST(msc->pcc_chan); >>> + } >>> + >>> + err = mpam_fb_check_shared_buffer_size(msc); >>> + if (err) { >>> + mpam_pcc_chan_put(msc->pcc_chan); >>> + >>> + return ERR_PTR(err); >>> + } >>> + >>> + err = mpam_fb_check_protocol_version(msc); >>> + if (err) { >>> + mpam_pcc_chan_put(msc->pcc_chan); >>> + >>> + return ERR_PTR(err); >>> + } >>> } else { >>> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> } >>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c >>> index 61a91c6cec0a..7a7fb6d067ba 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c >>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c >>> @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ >>> #define MPAM_MSC_TOKEN_MASK GENMASK(27, 18) >>> #define MPAM_FB_PROT_HEADER_LEN sizeof(u32) >>> +/* The longest message is MPAM_MSC_WRITE, with 4 parameters. */ >>> +#define MPAM_FB_MAX_MSG_SIZE (4 * sizeof(u32)) >>> + >>> +#define MPAM_FB_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK GENMASK(31, 16) >>> +#define MPAM_FB_VERSION_MINOR_MASK GENMASK(15, 0) >>> static atomic_t mpam_fb_token = ATOMIC_INIT(0); >>> @@ -207,3 +212,39 @@ int mpam_fb_send_write_request(struct mpam_msc >>> *msc, u16 reg, u32 value) >>> return mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, msc->id, reg, &value, >>> MPAM_MSC_WRITE_CMD); >>> } >>> + >>> +/* We only support MPAM-Fb protocol version 1.x */ >>> +int mpam_fb_check_protocol_version(struct mpam_msc *msc) >>> +{ >>> + u32 version; >>> + int ret; >>> + >>> + ret = mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, 0, >>> + 0, &version, MPAM_PROTOCOL_VERSION_CMD); >>> + if (ret) >>> + return ret; >>> + >>> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAM_FB_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK, version) != 1) { >>> + pr_err("Incompatible MPAM-Fb protocol version %ld.%ld\n", >>> + FIELD_GET(MPAM_FB_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK, version), >>> + FIELD_GET(MPAM_FB_VERSION_MINOR_MASK, version)); >>> + >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + } >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +int mpam_fb_check_shared_buffer_size(struct mpam_msc *msc) >>> +{ >>> + int min_buffer_size = MPAM_FB_MAX_MSG_SIZE + >>> + sizeof(struct acpi_pcct_ext_pcc_shared_memory); >>> + >>> + if (msc->pcc_chan->pcc_chan->shmem_size < min_buffer_size) { >>> + pr_err("MPAM-Fb PCC channel size too small.\n"); >>> + >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> + } >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/ >>> mpam_internal.h >>> index f13a79a84c58..8859189088f3 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h >>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h >>> @@ -528,6 +528,8 @@ static inline void >>> mpam_resctrl_teardown_class(struct mpam_class *class) { } >>> /* MPAM-Fb Firmware-backed protocol wrappers */ >>> int mpam_fb_send_read_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 >>> *result); >>> int mpam_fb_send_write_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 >>> value); >>> +int mpam_fb_check_protocol_version(struct mpam_msc *msc); >>> +int mpam_fb_check_shared_buffer_size(struct mpam_msc *msc); >>> /* >>> * MPAM MSCs have the following register layout. See: >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Srivathsa >> >