[PATCH v1] ACPI: TAD: Add locking around AML evaluations

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Aug 2026 20:53:32 +0200
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Organization Linux Kernel Development - Intel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

In the ACPI TAD driver, there are hidden assumptions that the ACPI
control methods used by it will not be evaluated concurrently due
to ACPICA namespace and interpreter locking.

However, that may not be the case since ACPICA may drop and re-acquire
the namespace and interpreter locks during the evaluation of a given
object in a few cases, including the one in which the AML in question
sleeps causing acpi_ex_system_do_sleep() to be called.  In that case,
the evaluation of one control method may be started while the
evaluation of another one is still in progress.

For this reason, add a global lock to the ACPI TAD driver and
acquire it every time before evaluating an ACPI control method,
except for the initial evaluation of _GCP in acpi_tad_probe().

Fixes: 95c513ec84f7 ("ACPI: Add Time and Alarm Device (TAD) driver")
Cc: All applicable <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/rtc.h>
@@ -86,6 +87,8 @@ static bool acpi_tad_rt_is_invalid(struc
 	    rt->daylight > 3;
 }
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_tad_aml_lock);
+
 static int acpi_tad_set_real_time(struct device *dev, struct acpi_tad_rt *rt)
 {
 	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
@@ -113,6 +116,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_set_real_time(struct
 	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&acpi_tad_aml_lock);
+
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SRT", &arg_list, &retval);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || retval)
 		return -EIO;
@@ -124,30 +129,27 @@ static int acpi_tad_evaluate_grt(struct
 {
 	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
 	struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
-	union acpi_object *out_obj;
-	struct acpi_tad_rt *data;
 	acpi_status status;
 	int ret = -EIO;
 
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_GRT", NULL, &output);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-		goto out_free;
-
-	out_obj = output.pointer;
-	if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
-		goto out_free;
-
-	if (out_obj->buffer.length != sizeof(*rt))
-		goto out_free;
-
-	data = (struct acpi_tad_rt *)(out_obj->buffer.pointer);
-	if (!data->valid)
-		goto out_free;
+	guard(mutex)(&acpi_tad_aml_lock);
 
-	memcpy(rt, data, sizeof(*rt));
-	ret = 0;
+	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_GRT", NULL, &output);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+		union acpi_object *out_obj;
 
-out_free:
+		out_obj = output.pointer;
+		if (out_obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER &&
+		    out_obj->buffer.length == sizeof(*rt)) {
+			struct acpi_tad_rt *data;
+
+			data = (struct acpi_tad_rt *)(out_obj->buffer.pointer);
+			if (data->valid) {
+				memcpy(rt, data, sizeof(*rt));
+				ret = 0;
+			}
+		}
+	}
 	ACPI_FREE(output.pointer);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -193,6 +195,8 @@ static int __acpi_tad_wake_set(struct de
 	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
 	args[1].integer.value = value;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&acpi_tad_aml_lock);
+
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, &retval);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || retval)
 		return -EIO;
@@ -215,6 +219,8 @@ static int __acpi_tad_wake_read(struct d
 
 	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&acpi_tad_aml_lock);
+
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, retval);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return -EIO;
@@ -416,6 +422,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_clear_status(struct
 	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&acpi_tad_aml_lock);
+
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_CWS", &arg_list, &retval);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || retval)
 		return -EIO;
@@ -456,6 +464,8 @@ static ssize_t acpi_tad_status_read(stru
 	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&acpi_tad_aml_lock);
+
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GWS", &arg_list, &retval);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return -EIO;