Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: PCI: Avoid misleading _OSC messages for non-PCIe host bridges without _OSC

"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci
Message-ID <CAJZ5v0g0MeLGgzHGihBXH3YBnDt4KGdq2uR8-F3H9b4Fszpx2Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 1:21 PM KONDO KAZUMA(近藤 和真) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> After commit 7d703df7f4f5 ("ACPI: bus: Split _OSC evaluation out of
> acpi_run_osc()"), the _OSC evaluation path now returns AE_ERROR to
> negotiate_os_control() instead of propagating AE_NOT_FOUND from
> acpi_evaluate_object().
>
> This has not caused any functional issues so far, but it produces
> additional misleading messages for non-PCIe host bridges without _OSC on
> some Intel servers:
>
>     kernel: ACPI: Enabled 2 GPEs in block 00 to 7F
>     kernel: ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [UNC0] (domain 0000 [bus fe])
>     kernel: acpi PNP0A03:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI EDR HPX-Type3]
>   + kernel: acpi PNP0A03:00: _OSC: OS requested [PCIeHotplug SHPCHotplug PME AER PCIeCapability LTR DPC]
>   + kernel: acpi PNP0A03:00: _OSC: platform willing to grant [PCIeHotplug SHPCHotplug PME AER PCIeCapability LTR DPC]
>   + kernel: acpi PNP0A03:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_ERROR)
>     kernel: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:fe
>
> Previously, negotiate_os_control() silently ignored AE_NOT_FOUND for
> non-PCIe host bridges without _OSC, but after the above change, it no
> longer does so.
>
> As a result, negotiate_os_control() logs messages as if the OS had
> negotiated with the platform via _OSC, even though the non-PCIe host
> bridge has no _OSC method and no such negotiation actually occurs.
>
> Skip _OSC negotiation for non-PCIe host bridges that do not define an
> _OSC method before attempting to evaluate it.
>
> Fixes: 7d703df7f4f5 ("ACPI: bus: Split _OSC evaluation out of acpi_run_osc()")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected]/
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kazuma Kondo <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Set *no_aspm to 1 when skipping _OSC negotiation.
> - Updated the debug message and the comment.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected]/
>
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 4c06c3ffd0cb..cab29a75a276 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -574,6 +574,17 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> +       if (!is_pcie(root) && !is_cxl(root) &&
> +           !acpi_has_method(handle, "_OSC")) {
> +               dev_dbg(&device->dev, "_OSC: Skipping a non-PCIe host bridge without _OSC\n");
> +
> +               /*
> +                * No ASPM for non-PCIe host bridges
> +                */
> +               *no_aspm = 1;
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
>         support = calculate_support();
>
>         decode_osc_support(root, "OS supports", support);
> @@ -615,10 +626,6 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
>                  */
>                 *no_aspm = 1;
>
> -               /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
> -               if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND && !is_pcie(root))
> -                       return;
> -
>                 if (control) {
>                         decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
>                         decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
> --

Applied as 7.3 material with some minor modifications, thanks!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.