Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: Support __free() from cleanup.h for ACPI objects

"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.platform-driver-x86
Message-ID <CAJZ5v0gQVFxSkkjPbRf6bsKdgUBGduZV0M5SWrHoeB246ZLqew@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 2:07 PM Sakari Ailus
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 11:13 PM Sakari Ailus
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Use DEFINE_FREE() to allow ACPI objects to be released automatically.
> >
> > But at least some of them are allocated by ACPICA functions like
> > acpi_evaluate_object() and so they have no proper constructors.
>
> You could still assign the return buffer to a local variable. It's not
> ideal API-wise though.

Exactly.

> I'm not quite sure what was the point you wanted to make but I reckon this
> wasn't an ack. :-)

Using the _FREE with variables that are not initialized through a
constructor is questionable, so this is generally not particularly
clean.

There is no cleanup.h in ACPICA that is a more traditional C code
base, so mixing up ACPICA code, which ACPI_FREE() is strictly
speaking, with cleanup.h stuff is not particularly straightforward
IMV.  I'd rather not do it.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.