Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] ACPI: PM: Introduce acpi_device_init_power()

"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID <CAJZ5v0iJ6Vu4+ZmZP+OLWX6WbfZkiU6uueV9qrPmjKquBmkdRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 10:29 AM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 06:25:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Two out of three callers of acpi_bus_init_power() need to clear
> > flags.power_manageable for the target device on errors, which
> > is somewhat cumbersome, so rename the function to
> > __acpi_device_init_power(), add a wrapper called
> > acpi_device_init_power() around it that will take care
> > of the flags.power_manageable clearing, and make the two
> > callers of acpi_bus_init_power() in question invoke that
> > wrapper.
> >
> > While at it, clean up the declaration of local variables
> > in __acpi_device_init_power().
>
> ...
>
> >  {
> > -     int state;
> > -     int result;
> > +     int result, state;
>
> Not sure if this change is required.

Nope, but I think that it's useful.

> >       result = acpi_device_get_power(device, &state);
> >       if (result)
>
> ...
>
> > +int acpi_device_init_power(struct acpi_device *device)
>
> Ah, here is a helper!

Yeah, I guess it's better to fold it into the first patch.

> > +{
> > +     int ret;
>
> Elsewhere in the file it's called 'result'.

Yes, it is.

So I guess you're suggesting to also use that name here, which is fair enough.

> > +
> > +     ret = __acpi_device_init_power(device);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             device->flags.power_manageable = 0;
> > +
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.