Re: [PATCH v6 02/15] ACPI: CPPC: Validate _CPC entry and control semantics
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0j=n4uf=GFVDumb2v1sqcS_f293BG2iCD-Vmp2vpLC=xg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 3:32 PM Christian Loehle <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/30/26 12:56, Christian Loehle wrote: > > Writable _CPC controls are Register descriptors encoded as Buffer objects. > > Integer entries represent fixed values or unsupported optional registers; > > Autonomous Selection Integer 1 is the special immutable form which enables > > operation without Desired Performance. > > > > The parser accepts arbitrary object types and cpc_write() assumes that its > > argument contains a GAS. Malformed firmware can therefore make it interpret > > an Integer union member as a register. > > > > Validate the portion of each encoding consumed by the driver: bound Integer > > DWORD forms to 32 bits, and require Buffer entries to start with a complete > > Generic Register descriptor with the expected header. Continue tolerating > > Integer 0 for an absent optional register and retain type checks in > > cpc_write() as defense in depth. Reject an attempt to disable immutable > > Autonomous Selection instead of silently applying only the EPP part of the > > request. > > > > Capability registers are read into u64 temporaries but exposed through u32 > > fields. Reject values above U32_MAX instead of allowing them to be > > truncated. In particular, a truncated Highest Performance value can become > > a zero divisor in the performance-to-frequency conversion. Enforce the > > required ordering from Highest through Nominal, Lowest Nonlinear, and > > Lowest Performance, and constrain a present Guaranteed Performance to the > > inclusive Lowest-to-Nominal range. Also reject reversed frequency anchors > > and unequal frequency anchors with identical performance anchors. Those > > invalid tuples otherwise make affine-conversion differences wrap or divide > > by zero. > > > > Check mandatory object presence separately from the Integer-zero convention > > for absent optional fields. ACPI does not reserve zero in the abstract > > Lowest Performance scale, so accept a present Lowest Performance DWORD of > > zero when distinct frequency anchors provide a usable nonzero physical > > minimum. Retain the old rejection when that mapping is unavailable and the > > fallback conversion would expose a 0 kHz cpufreq endpoint. > > > > Minimum Performance also defines zero as a real no-limit value, but the > > exported cppc_set_perf() interface historically used zero to omit a bound. > > Add explicit validity flags so callers can request zero without changing > > that legacy convention. Populate the flags when reading the controls and > > mark the bounds supplied by amd-pstate explicitly. > > > > Performance Limited is listed as a required Buffer, but the interface does > > not depend on it to control performance and the specification permits a > > platform with no limiting indication to always report zero. Preserve > > the compatibility with firmware that represents that case using a NULL > > register descriptor instead of disabling CPPC entirely. > > > > Emit an error when a present _CPC package fails parsing or initialization > > so such firmware and resource failures no longer silently suppress cpufreq. > > Initialize malformed-package failures to -EINVAL and preserve specific > > allocation, mapping, and unsupported-access errors in that diagnostic. > > > > Fixes: 337aadff8e45 ("ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC") > > Reported-by: Sashiko <[email protected]> > > Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260724134251.1632824-1-christian.loehle%40arm.com > > Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 12 ++- > > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 2 + > > 3 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > > index 3b8cdf88e31d..6f3ffa4a1845 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > > @@ -129,6 +129,21 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *, cpc_desc_ptr); > > !!(cpc)->cpc_entry.int_value : \ > > !IS_NULL_REG(&(cpc)->cpc_entry.reg)) > > > > +static bool cpc_is_writable(const struct cpc_register_resource *cpc) > > +{ > > + return cpc->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && > > + !IS_NULL_REG(&cpc->cpc_entry.reg); > > +} > > + > > +static bool cpc_entry_present(const struct cpc_register_resource *cpc) > > +{ > > + if (cpc->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) > > + return true; > > + > > + return cpc->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && > > + !IS_NULL_REG(&cpc->cpc_entry.reg); > > +} > > + > > /* > > * Each bit indicates the optionality of the register in per-cpu > > * cpc_regs[] with the corresponding index. 0 means mandatory and 1 > > @@ -142,6 +157,29 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *, cpc_desc_ptr); > > */ > > #define IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG(reg_idx) (REG_OPTIONAL & (1U << (reg_idx))) > > > > +static bool cpc_integer_entry_valid(unsigned int reg_idx, u64 value) > > +{ > > + switch (reg_idx) { > > + case HIGHEST_PERF: > > + case NOMINAL_PERF: > > + case LOW_NON_LINEAR_PERF: > > + case LOWEST_PERF: > > + case CTR_WRAP_TIME: > > + case REFERENCE_PERF: > > + case LOWEST_FREQ: > > + case NOMINAL_FREQ: > > + return value <= U32_MAX; > > > Sashiko: > "Does this incorrectly restrict the counter wraparound time to 32 bits? > The ACPI specification allows firmware to provide a 64-bit QWord integer > for the Counter Wraparound Time. The cppc_perf_fb_ctrs structure already > models this as a 64-bit value internally > If firmware provides a valid 64-bit integer exceeding U32_MAX for this > register, cpc_integer_entry_valid() will return false and completely abort > CPPC initialization for the CPU. Can we remove this restriction for > CTR_WRAP_TIME?" > This is true. ACPI spec 6.6 and 6.5 (Table 8.23) describe it as > Integer (DWORD) or Buffer > The 64-bit internal representation is only for the case of firmware > providing it as Buffer. > > > + case AUTO_SEL_ENABLE: > > + return value <= 1; > > + case DESIRED_PERF: > > + /* Validated against Autonomous Selection after parsing. */ > > + return value == 0; > > + default: > > + /* Tolerate the customary Integer 0 for an absent option. */ > > + return value == 0 && IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG(reg_idx); > > + } > > +} > > + > Sashiko: > "Does this incorrectly restrict the counter wraparound time to 32 bits? > The ACPI specification allows firmware to provide a 64-bit QWord integer > for the Counter Wraparound Time. The cppc_perf_fb_ctrs structure already > models this as a 64-bit value internally. > If firmware provides a valid 64-bit integer exceeding U32_MAX for this > register, cpc_integer_entry_valid() will return false and completely abort > CPPC initialization for the CPU. Can we remove this restriction for > CTR_WRAP_TIME?" It looks like you pasted the same comment twice. Or did Sashiko hallucinate? > GUARANTEED_PERF and TIME_WINDOW: both are Buffer-only Register descriptors. > Nonzero Integer encodings are invalid and Integer 0 is tolerated because > the previous parser allowed it too. I don't know of any platform describing > this myself. > > > /* > > * Arbitrary Retries in case the remote processor is slow to respond > > * to PCC commands. Keeping it high enough to cover emulators where > > @@ -150,6 +188,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *, cpc_desc_ptr); > > #define NUM_RETRIES 500ULL > > > > #define OVER_16BTS_MASK ~0xFFFFULL > > +#define CPC_GENERIC_REGISTER_DESCRIPTOR 0x82 > > +#define CPC_GENERIC_REGISTER_LENGTH (sizeof(struct cpc_reg) - 3) > > > > #define define_one_cppc_ro(_name) \ > > static struct kobj_attribute _name = \ > > @@ -773,8 +813,10 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > acpi_handle handle = pr->handle; > > unsigned int num_ent, i, cpc_rev; > > int pcc_subspace_id = -1; > > + bool cpc_present = false; > > acpi_status status; > > int ret = -ENODATA; > > + int err; > > > > if (!osc_sb_cppc2_support_acked) { > > pr_debug("CPPC v2 _OSC not acked\n"); > > @@ -791,6 +833,8 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > ret = -ENODEV; > > goto out_buf_free; > > } > > + cpc_present = true; > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > > out_obj = (union acpi_object *) output.pointer; > > if (out_obj->package.count < 2) { > > @@ -871,11 +915,32 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > cpc_obj = &out_obj->package.elements[i]; > > > > if (cpc_obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) { > > - cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; > > - cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].cpc_entry.int_value = cpc_obj->integer.value; > > + if (!cpc_integer_entry_valid(i - 2, > > + cpc_obj->integer.value)) { > > + pr_debug("Invalid Integer _CPC register %u for CPU:%d\n", > > + i - 2, pr->id); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + goto out_free; > > + } > > + cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i - 2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; > > + cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i - 2].cpc_entry.int_value = cpc_obj->integer.value; > > } else if (cpc_obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) { > > + if (cpc_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(*gas_t)) { > > + pr_debug("Invalid register descriptor for CPU:%d\n", > > + pr->id); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + goto out_free; > > + } > > + > > gas_t = (struct cpc_reg *) > > cpc_obj->buffer.pointer; > > + if (gas_t->descriptor != CPC_GENERIC_REGISTER_DESCRIPTOR || > > + gas_t->length != CPC_GENERIC_REGISTER_LENGTH) { > > + pr_debug("Invalid register resource for CPU:%d\n", > > + pr->id); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + goto out_free; > > + } > > > > /* > > * The PCC Subspace index is encoded inside > > @@ -886,8 +951,11 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > if (gas_t->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM) { > > if (pcc_subspace_id < 0) { > > pcc_subspace_id = gas_t->access_width; > > - if (pcc_data_alloc(pcc_subspace_id)) > > + err = pcc_data_alloc(pcc_subspace_id); > > + if (err) { > > + ret = err; > > goto out_free; > > + } > > } else if (pcc_subspace_id != gas_t->access_width) { > > pr_debug("Mismatched PCC ids in _CPC for CPU:%d\n", > > pr->id); > > @@ -900,14 +968,18 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > > > if (!osc_cpc_flexible_adr_space_confirmed) { > > pr_debug("Flexible address space capability not supported\n"); > > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > if (!cpc_supported_by_cpu()) > > goto out_free; > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > } > > > > access_width = GET_BIT_WIDTH(gas_t) / 8; > > addr = ioremap(gas_t->address, access_width); > > - if (!addr) > > + if (!addr) { > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > goto out_free; > > + } > > cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].sys_mem_vaddr = addr; > > } > > } else if (gas_t->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) { > > @@ -929,14 +1001,17 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > } > > if (!osc_cpc_flexible_adr_space_confirmed) { > > pr_debug("Flexible address space capability not supported\n"); > > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > if (!cpc_supported_by_cpu()) > > goto out_free; > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > } > > } else { > > if (gas_t->space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE || !cpc_ffh_supported()) { > > /* Support only PCC, SystemMemory, SystemIO, and FFH type regs. */ > > pr_debug("Unsupported register type (%d) in _CPC\n", > > gas_t->space_id); > > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > goto out_free; > > } > > } > > @@ -961,15 +1036,35 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > } > > per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, pr->id) = pcc_subspace_id; > > > > + /* > > + * Performance Limited is required by the specification, but tolerate a > > + * NULL descriptor used by firmware which cannot report limiting events. > > + * CPPC control does not depend on this status. > > + */ > > + for (i = 0; i < num_ent - 2; i++) { > > + if (i != DESIRED_PERF && i != PERF_LIMITED && > > + !IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG(i) && > > + !cpc_entry_present(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i])) { > > + pr_debug("CPU:%d lacks mandatory _CPC register %u\n", > > + pr->id, i); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + goto out_free; > > + } > > + } > > + > > /* > > * In CPPC v1, DESIRED_PERF is mandatory. In CPPC v2, it is optional > > * only when AUTO_SEL_ENABLE is supported. > > */ > > - if (!CPC_SUPPORTED(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[DESIRED_PERF]) && > > + if (!cpc_is_writable(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[DESIRED_PERF]) && > > (!osc_sb_cppc2_support_acked || > > - !CPC_SUPPORTED(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE]))) > > - pr_warn("Desired perf. register is mandatory if CPPC v2 is not supported " > > - "or autonomous selection is disabled\n"); > > + cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER || > > + cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE].cpc_entry.int_value != 1)) { > > + pr_debug("CPU:%d lacks a writable Desired Performance register\n", > > + pr->id); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + goto out_free; > > + } > > > > /* > > * Initialize the remaining cpc_regs as unsupported. > > @@ -1037,6 +1132,8 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > kfree(cpc_ptr); > > > > out_buf_free: > > + if (cpc_present) > > + pr_err("CPU%d: failed to initialize _CPC: %d\n", pr->id, ret); > > kfree(output.pointer); > > return ret; > > } > > @@ -1217,11 +1314,18 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val) > > u64 prev_val; > > void __iomem *vaddr = NULL; > > int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu); > > - struct cpc_reg *reg = ®_res->cpc_entry.reg; > > + struct cpc_reg *reg; > > struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc; > > unsigned long flags; > > bool locked = false; > > > > + if (reg_res->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + > > + reg = ®_res->cpc_entry.reg; > > + if (IS_NULL_REG(reg)) > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + > > size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg); > > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) && > > @@ -1364,7 +1468,9 @@ static int cppc_get_reg_val(int cpu, enum cppc_regs reg_idx, u64 *val) > > > > reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[reg_idx]; > > > > - if ((reg->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER && IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG(reg_idx) && > > + /* Desired may be absent for immutable autonomous selection. */ > > + if ((reg->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER && > > + (IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG(reg_idx) || reg_idx == DESIRED_PERF) && > > !reg->cpc_entry.int_value) || (reg->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER && > > IS_NULL_REG(®->cpc_entry.reg))) { > > pr_debug("CPC register is not supported\n"); > > @@ -1415,7 +1521,7 @@ static int cppc_set_reg_val(int cpu, enum cppc_regs reg_idx, u64 val) > > reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[reg_idx]; > > > > /* if a register is writeable, it must be a buffer and not null */ > > - if ((reg->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) || IS_NULL_REG(®->cpc_entry.reg)) { > > + if (!cpc_is_writable(reg)) { > > pr_debug("CPC register is not supported\n"); > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > } > > @@ -1505,7 +1611,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) > > struct cpc_register_resource *highest_reg, *lowest_reg, > > *lowest_non_linear_reg, *nominal_reg, *reference_reg, > > *guaranteed_reg, *low_freq_reg = NULL, *nom_freq_reg = NULL; > > - u64 high, low, guaranteed, nom, ref, min_nonlinear, > > + u64 high, low, guaranteed = 0, nom, ref, min_nonlinear, > > low_f = 0, nom_f = 0; > > int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpunum); > > struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL; > > @@ -1588,7 +1694,12 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) > > goto out_err; > > perf_caps->lowest_nonlinear_perf = min_nonlinear; > > > > - if (!high || !low || !nom || !ref || !min_nonlinear) { > > + if (!high || !nom || !ref || !min_nonlinear || > > + high > U32_MAX || low > U32_MAX || guaranteed > U32_MAX || > > + nom > U32_MAX || ref > U32_MAX || min_nonlinear > U32_MAX || > > + high < nom || nom < min_nonlinear || min_nonlinear < low || > > + (CPC_SUPPORTED(guaranteed_reg) && > > + (guaranteed < low || guaranteed > nom))) { > > ret = -EFAULT; > > goto out_err; > > } > > @@ -1605,6 +1716,19 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) > > if (ret) > > goto out_err; > > } > > + /* > > + * Require ordered anchors and a nonzero slope when frequencies differ. > > + * A zero Lowest Performance needs that affine mapping to produce a > > + * nonzero physical minimum frequency. > > + */ > > + if (low_f > U32_MAX || nom_f > U32_MAX || > > + (!low && (!low_f || !nom_f || low_f == nom_f)) || > > + (low_f && nom_f && > > + (nom_f < low_f || nom < low || > > + (nom_f != low_f && nom == low)))) { > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > + goto out_err; > > + } > > > > perf_caps->lowest_freq = low_f; > > perf_caps->nominal_freq = nom_f; > > @@ -1779,6 +1903,9 @@ int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls, bool enable) > > > > auto_sel_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE]; > > epp_set_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[ENERGY_PERF]; > > + if (!enable && auto_sel_reg->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER && > > + auto_sel_reg->cpc_entry.int_value == 1) > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > epp_ffh_sysmem = CPC_SUPPORTED(epp_set_reg) && > > (CPC_IN_FFH(epp_set_reg) || CPC_IN_SYSTEM_MEMORY(epp_set_reg)); > > @@ -1791,13 +1918,13 @@ int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls, bool enable) > > return -ENODEV; > > } > > > > - if (CPC_SUPPORTED(auto_sel_reg)) { > > + if (cpc_is_writable(auto_sel_reg)) { > > ret = cpc_write(cpu, auto_sel_reg, enable); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - if (CPC_SUPPORTED(epp_set_reg)) { > > + if (cpc_is_writable(epp_set_reg)) { > > ret = cpc_write(cpu, epp_set_reg, perf_ctrls->energy_perf); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > @@ -1996,6 +2123,8 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls) > > max_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[MAX_PERF]; > > energy_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[ENERGY_PERF]; > > auto_sel_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE]; > > + perf_ctrls->max_perf_valid = false; > > + perf_ctrls->min_perf_valid = false; > > > > /* Are any of the regs PCC ?*/ > > if (CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(max_perf_reg) || > > @@ -2020,6 +2149,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls) > > ret = cpc_read(cpu, max_perf_reg, &max); > > if (ret) > > goto out_err; > > + perf_ctrls->max_perf_valid = true; > > } > > perf_ctrls->max_perf = max; > > > > @@ -2027,6 +2157,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls) > > ret = cpc_read(cpu, min_perf_reg, &min); > > if (ret) > > goto out_err; > > + perf_ctrls->min_perf_valid = true; > > } > > perf_ctrls->min_perf = min; > > > > @@ -2113,14 +2244,11 @@ int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls) > > if (CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_reg)) > > cpc_write(cpu, desired_reg, perf_ctrls->desired_perf); > > > > - /* > > - * Only write if min_perf and max_perf not zero. Some drivers pass zero > > - * value to min and max perf, but they don't mean to set the zero value, > > - * they just don't want to write to those registers. > > - */ > > - if (perf_ctrls->min_perf && CPC_SUPPORTED(min_perf_reg)) > > + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(min_perf_reg) && > > + (perf_ctrls->min_perf || perf_ctrls->min_perf_valid)) > > cpc_write(cpu, min_perf_reg, perf_ctrls->min_perf); > > - if (perf_ctrls->max_perf && CPC_SUPPORTED(max_perf_reg)) > > + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(max_perf_reg) && > > + (perf_ctrls->max_perf || perf_ctrls->max_perf_valid)) > > cpc_write(cpu, max_perf_reg, perf_ctrls->max_perf); > > > > if (regs_in_pcc) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > > index d4ff8b228f86..63f0ca5f19b3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > > @@ -544,7 +544,13 @@ static int shmem_update_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u8 min_perf, > > u8 des_perf, u8 max_perf, u8 epp, bool fast_switch) > > { > > struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data; > > - struct cppc_perf_ctrls perf_ctrls; > > + struct cppc_perf_ctrls perf_ctrls = { > > + .max_perf = max_perf, > > + .min_perf = min_perf, > > + .desired_perf = des_perf, > > + .max_perf_valid = true, > > + .min_perf_valid = true, > > + }; > > u64 value, prev; > > int ret; > > > > @@ -577,10 +583,6 @@ static int shmem_update_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u8 min_perf, > > if (value == prev) > > return 0; > > > > - perf_ctrls.max_perf = max_perf; > > - perf_ctrls.min_perf = min_perf; > > - perf_ctrls.desired_perf = des_perf; > > - > > ret = cppc_set_perf(cpudata->cpu, &perf_ctrls); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h > > index 94a6277edab2..5dcbe65c5ddc 100644 > > --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h > > +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h > > @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ struct cppc_perf_ctrls { > > u32 desired_perf; > > u32 energy_perf; > > bool auto_sel; > > + bool max_perf_valid; > > + bool min_perf_valid; > > }; > > > > struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs { >