Re: [PATCH 05/10] am68k/PCI: Remove unnecessary second application of align

On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> Hi Ilpo,
> 
> On Tue, 2026-03-24 at 18:56 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Aligning res->start by align inside pcibios_align_resource() is
> > unnecessary because caller of pcibios_align_resource() is
> > __find_resource_space() that aligns res->start with align before
> > calling pcibios_align_resource().
> > 
> > Aligning by align in case of IORESOURCE_IO && start & 0x300 cannot ever
> > result in changing start either because 0x300 bits would have not
> > survived the earlier alignment if align was large enough to have an
> > impact.
> > 
> > Thus, remove the duplicated aligning from pcibios_align_resource().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/m68k/kernel/pcibios.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/pcibios.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/pcibios.c
> > index 1415f6e4e5ce..7e286ee1976b 100644
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/pcibios.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/pcibios.c
> > @@ -36,8 +36,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> >  	if ((res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) && (start & 0x300))
> >  		start = (start + 0x3ff) & ~0x3ff;
> >  
> > -	start = (start + align - 1) & ~(align - 1);
> > -
> >  	return start;
> >  }
> > 
> 
> Sorry if it's a stupid question, but what does "am68k" in the subject refer to?

The extra "a" is a typo. I'm sorry about that.

-- 
 i.