Re: [patch 14/38] slub: Use prandom instead of get_cycles()
"Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-alpha,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fbdev,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-openrisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.sparclinux,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/10/26 14:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The decision whether to scan remote nodes is based on a 'random' number > retrieved via get_cycles(). get_cycles() is about to be removed. > > There is already prandom state in the code, so use that instead. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] LGTM. Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <[email protected]>