Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/13] exec: add spawn templates for repeated executable startup

Li Chen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-api,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Gabriel,

Yes, I looked at Josh's slides and your RFC a few days ago.

I agree that io_uring is a very interesting direction, and I can see why it
fits the "ordered setup operations before exec" model.

My current preference is still to first explore a pidfd/pidfs-based builder,
modeled roughly like fsconfig(). Process creation feels like a core process
lifecycle API, and I think a normal fd-based syscall interface may be easier
for libc, language runtimes, shells,and sandboxing tools to adopt.

My hesitation is practical rather than conceptual.Some important
deployments still disable io_uring entirely; Docker's default seccomp
profile blocks the io_uring syscalls, and Google has disabled or restricted
io_uring in ChromeOS, Android app processes, and production servers.

I will study your io_uring work more carefully and compare the two directions.
One possible outcome is that io_uring can drive/share the same builder object later;
I do not know that yet.

Thanks for pointing this out.

 ---- On Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:24:00 +0800  Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]> wrote --- 
 > Li Chen <[email protected]> writes:
 > 
 > > Hi,
 > >
 > > This is an early RFC for an idea that is probably still rough in both the
 > > UAPI and implementation details. Sorry for the rough edges; I am sending
 > > it now to check whether this direction is worth pursuing and to get
 > > feedback on the kernel/userspace boundary.
 > >
 > > The series is based on linux-next version 20260518.
 > >
 > > This RFC adds spawn_template, a userspace-controlled exec acceleration
 > > mechanism for runtimes that repeatedly start the same executable with
 > > different argv, envp, and per-spawn file descriptor setup.
 > 
 > Have you looked at Josh's proposal to do this over io_uring [1] and my
 > implementation of it at [2]?  I think io_uring is a very natural
 > interface for something like this, it will avoid adding a larger API,
 > since you could, in theory, set up the entire new task context using
 > regular io_uring operations in an io workqueue and then starting it would
 > be a matter of forking the pre-configured io thread with a new io_uring
 > operation.
 > 
 > [1]
 > https://lpc.events/event/16/contributions/1213/attachments/1012/1945/io-uring-spawn.pdf
 > [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/1001622/
 > 
 > >
 > > The main target is agent runtimes. Modern coding agents repeatedly start
 > > short-lived helper tools such as rg, git, sed, awk, python, node, and
 > > shell wrappers while they inspect and edit a workspace. Those runtimes
 > > already know which tools are hot, and they are also the right place to
 > > decide policy. The kernel does not choose names such as rg, git, or sed.
 > > Userspace opts in by creating a template fd for one executable, then uses
 > > that fd for later spawns. Launchers, shells, and build systems have a
 > > similar repeated-startup shape and could use the same primitive, but the
 > > agent runtime case is the main motivation for this RFC.
 > >
 > > The mechanism applies to the executable that userspace asks the kernel to
 > > start. If an agent runtime directly starts /usr/bin/rg, the rg executable
 > > is the template target. If the runtime starts /usr/bin/bash -c "rg ... |
 > > head", the shell is the template target unless the shell itself opts in
 > > when it starts rg and head. The kernel does not parse the shell command
 > > string or rewrite inner commands into template spawns. Userspace has to
 > > call spawn_template for those inner commands explicitly:
 > >
 > >     direct exec                 shell wrapper
 > >     -----------                 -------------
 > >     agent                       agent
 > >       template("/usr/bin/rg")     template("/usr/bin/bash")
 > >       spawn rg argv              spawn bash -c "rg ... | head"
 > >
 > >     kernel target: rg          kernel target: bash
 > >     rg startup benefits        rg/head need shell opt-in
 > >
 > > Several agent runtime discussions are moving toward direct argv-style
 > > exec tools for both security and policy clarity. For example, opencode
 > > issue #2206 proposes an exec tool as a safer alternative to a shell-only
 > > bash tool:
 > >
 > > https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/2206
 > >
 > > spawn_template is meant to support both models. Direct exec users can
 > > cache the actual hot tool. Shell-wrapper users can cache the shell and
 > > still reduce shell startup cost. If a shell or an agent runtime later
 > > uses the same API for commands started inside a shell command, those
 > > inner tools can benefit too.
 > >
 > > Each spawn still goes through the normal exec path. The template reuses
 > > only metadata that can be revalidated before use. Credential preparation,
 > > permission checks, binary handler checks, secure-exec handling, and LSM
 > > hooks remain on the normal execve path.
 > >
 > > The UAPI has two operations. spawn_template_create() creates an
 > > anonymous-inode template fd from either an executable fd or an absolute
 > > executable path. spawn_template_spawn() starts one child from that
 > > template, applies per-spawn fd, cwd, and signal actions, and returns both
 > > pid and pidfd.
 > >
 > > fd inheritance is deliberately conservative. By default, after the
 > > requested per-spawn actions have run, the child closes fds above stderr.
 > > An agent runtime can still request traditional inheritance explicitly,
 > > but helper tools do not inherit unrelated secret files or sockets by
 > > accident. The create-time actions fields are reserved and rejected in
 > > this RFC because fd numbers are per-process state, not stable reusable
 > > objects. The caller supplies fd actions for each spawn instead.
 > >
 > > A typical agent runtime would keep one template per hot executable and
 > > still build argv, envp, cwd, and pipe wiring for each tool call:
 > >
 > >     rg_tmpl = spawn_template_create("/usr/bin/rg");
 > >
 > >     for each search request:
 > >         out_r, out_w = pipe_cloexec();
 > >         err_r, err_w = pipe_cloexec();
 > >         actions = [
 > >             FCHDIR(worktree_fd),
 > >             DUP2(out_w, STDOUT_FILENO),
 > >             DUP2(err_w, STDERR_FILENO),
 > >         ];
 > >         child = spawn_template_spawn(rg_tmpl, rg_argv, envp, actions);
 > >         close(out_w);
 > >         close(err_w);
 > >         read out_r and err_r;
 > >         waitid(P_PIDFD, child.pidfd, ...);
 > >
 > > A shell-wrapper runtime would use the same shape with a template for
 > > /usr/bin/bash and argv such as ["/usr/bin/bash", "-c", command]. That
 > > reduces shell startup cost, but it does not cache rg or head inside that
 > > command unless the shell also opts into spawn_template for commands it
 > > starts internally.
 > >
 > > The template pins the executable and denies writes to that file while the
 > > template fd is alive, so cached executable metadata cannot race with a
 > > writer changing the same inode. This means direct in-place writes to the
 > > executable can fail while a runtime keeps a template open. It does not
 > > block the common package-manager update pattern where a new inode is
 > > written and then atomically renamed over the old path. In that case the
 > > old path-created template becomes stale, spawn_template_spawn() rejects
 > > it with ESTALE, and the runtime should close and recreate the template
 > > for the new executable.
 > >
 > >     in-place write              package-manager update
 > >     --------------              ----------------------
 > >     template pins old inode     write new inode
 > >     write(old inode) denied     rename(new, "/usr/bin/rg")
 > >
 > >     cached metadata safe        old template sees path mismatch
 > >                                 spawn_template_spawn() = -ESTALE
 > >                                 recreate template for new inode
 > >
 > > Each spawn revalidates executable identity before cached metadata is
 > > used. Path-created templates only accept absolute paths: a relative path
 > > such as ./tool depends on cwd, and the same string can name a different
 > > file after chdir. For an absolute path template, each spawn reopens the
 > > path and checks that it still resolves to the executable recorded when
 > > the template was created. If the path now names a replaced file, the
 > > template is stale and userspace should close and recreate it.
 > >
 > > A template fd can be passed over SCM_RIGHTS like any other fd, but this
 > > RFC does not treat that as delegation. spawn_template_spawn() only works
 > > while the caller still has the same struct cred object that created the
 > > template. If another task, or the same task after a credential change,
 > > receives the fd, spawn fails instead of running the executable using the
 > > creator's launch authority:
 > >
 > >     ordinary fd                         spawn_template fd
 > >     -----------                         -----------------
 > >     A: open log                         A: create rg template
 > >     A -> B: SCM_RIGHTS(fd)              A -> B: SCM_RIGHTS(tfd)
 > >
 > >     B: read(fd) = ok                    B: spawn(tfd) = -EACCES
 > >                                         B: create own rg template
 > >                                         B: spawn(own_tfd) = ok
 > >
 > >     open-file use is delegated          spawn authority is not delegated
 > >
 > > The cached state is intentionally small. The template fd keeps the opened
 > > main executable file, an optional absolute path string, the creator
 > > credential pointer, and the deny-write state. The executable identity key
 > > records device, inode, size, mode, owner, ctime, and mtime, and is
 > > rechecked before cached metadata is used. The ELF cache keeps only the
 > > main executable's ELF header, program header table, and program header
 > > count.
 > >
 > >     cached in this RFC          not cached in this RFC
 > >     ------------------          ----------------------
 > >     opened main executable      PT_INTERP metadata
 > >     executable identity key     shared-library graph
 > >     main ELF header             VMA layout metadata
 > >     main ELF program headers    cross-process metadata sharing
 > >     creator cred pointer
 > >     deny-write state
 > >
 > > This RFC does not cache ELF interpreter metadata, shared-library
 > > dependency state, or derived mapping-layout state. Shared-library
 > > resolution is dynamic linker policy and depends on LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
 > > RPATH, RUNPATH, /etc/ld.so.cache, mount namespaces, and secure-exec
 > > state. It also does not share cached executable metadata between template
 > > fds created by different processes. Each template owns its small cached
 > > metadata object in this RFC.
 > >
 > > Performance
 > > ===========
 > >
 > > The numbers below come from my separate local autogen-bench project.
 > > autogen-bench uses AutoGen [1] Core as the agent harness: RoutedAgent
 > > instances run under SingleThreadedAgentRuntime, and RPC-style dispatch
 > > fans out concurrent tool-call requests to worker agents. The workload
 > > definitions, generated test files, and subprocess/spawn_template backends
 > > are local to autogen-bench.
 > >
 > > The agent-tools preset includes direct tool calls and shell-wrapper forms
 > > for:
 > >
 > > rg, grep, sed, awk, cat, head, tail, find, stat, ls, git-status, git-diff,
 > > python-small, node-small, sh-c, and bash-c.
 > >
 > > The benchmark is launch-heavy but not no-op: it searches generated
 > > Python-like source files, reads sample files, runs small Python and
 > > Node.js programs, and runs git status and git diff in a small repository.
 > > It does not include model inference or long-running tool work, so the
 > > numbers mainly describe the short-tool regime.
 > >
 > > The subprocess column starts each tool call through the existing
 > > userspace launch path. The spawn_template column creates templates for
 > > hot executables and uses spawn_template_spawn() for later calls.
 > >
 > > Total in-flight tool calls stay at 16; only the worker-process split
 > > changes. For example, 4x4 means 4 worker processes with 4 in-flight tool
 > > calls each. The two time_s values are subprocess/spawn_template wall
 > > times.
 > >
 > > Workload     Calls  subprocess  spawn_template  time_s       Delta
 > > (workers)    calls  calls/s     calls/s         seconds
 > > 1x16         6144      411.04          420.32   14.95/14.62  +2.26%
 > > 2x8          6144      666.78          690.08    9.21/8.90   +3.49%
 > > 4x4          6144      955.61         1003.25    6.43/6.12   +4.99%
 > > 8x2          6144     1048.25         1069.18    5.86/5.75   +2.00%
 > >
 > > The table measures the whole mixed workload, including both process
 > > startup and the short tool work done after exec. Since this workload is
 > > launch-heavy, the possible launch-side savings include:
 > >
 > > - the template fd keeps an opened executable, avoiding repeated ordinary
 > >   open/path setup for that executable;
 > > - the kernel can reuse cached main-executable ELF header and program
 > >   header metadata after revalidation;
 > > - the fork-and-exec-style launch is submitted as one
 > >   spawn_template_spawn() operation;
 > > - fd, cwd, and signal actions run in the child kernel path instead of
 > >   being driven one syscall at a time by userspace child glue;
 > > - pid and pidfd are returned by the same operation, reducing some
 > >   runtime-side bookkeeping.
 > >
 > > In local experiments before this RFC, I also tried caching ELF
 > > interpreter metadata and derived ELF mapping-layout metadata. A focused
 > > repeated-exec benchmark did not show a stable standalone throughput gain
 > > for those two optimizations, so this RFC leaves them out and keeps only
 > > the main executable metadata cache.
 > >
 > > I also tried sharing main-executable ELF metadata across template fds
 > > created by different processes for the same executable identity. That can
 > > reduce duplicated metadata memory when many agent worker processes create
 > > their own templates for /usr/bin/rg, /usr/bin/git, and similar tools, but
 > > it did not show a stable throughput win in local multi-agent tests. It
 > > also adds cache keying, lifetime, invalidation, credential, and namespace
 > > questions to the RFC. This version therefore keeps per-template metadata
 > > ownership and leaves cross-process sharing out.
 > >
 > > Sorry again for the rough edges in this RFC. I would appreciate feedback
 > > on whether this direction is useful and what the right API boundary
 > > should be.
 > >
 > > Thanks,
 > > Li
 > >
 > > [1]: https://github.com/microsoft/autogen
 > >
 > > Li Chen (13):
 > >   exec: factor argument setup out of do_execveat_common()
 > >   exec: add an internal helper for opened executables
 > >   file: expose helpers for in-kernel fd actions
 > >   exec: add spawn template UAPI definitions
 > >   exec: add spawn template file descriptors
 > >   exec: add spawn_template_spawn()
 > >   exec: validate spawn template executable identity
 > >   binfmt_elf: cache ELF metadata for spawn templates
 > >   Documentation: describe spawn templates
 > >   exec: require absolute paths for path-created templates
 > >   exec: let close-range actions target the max fd
 > >   syscalls: add generic spawn template entries
 > >   selftests/exec: cover spawn template basics
 > >
 > >  Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst         |   1 +
 > >  .../userspace-api/spawn_template.rst          | 153 +++
 > >  MAINTAINERS                                   |   6 +
 > >  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl        |   3 +-
 > >  fs/Makefile                                   |   2 +-
 > >  fs/binfmt_elf.c                               | 104 +-
 > >  fs/exec.c                                     | 162 ++-
 > >  fs/file.c                                     |  11 +-
 > >  fs/spawn_template.c                           | 619 +++++++++++
 > >  include/linux/binfmts.h                       |  10 +
 > >  include/linux/fdtable.h                       |   2 +
 > >  include/linux/spawn_template.h                |  72 ++
 > >  include/linux/syscalls.h                      |   7 +
 > >  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h             |   7 +-
 > >  include/uapi/linux/spawn_template.h           |  62 ++
 > >  scripts/syscall.tbl                           |   2 +
 > >  tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile         |   1 +
 > >  tools/testing/selftests/exec/spawn_template.c | 997 ++++++++++++++++++
 > >  18 files changed, 2179 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
 > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/spawn_template.rst
 > >  create mode 100644 fs/spawn_template.c
 > >  create mode 100644 include/linux/spawn_template.h
 > >  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/spawn_template.h
 > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/exec/spawn_template.c
 > 
 > -- 
 > Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
 > 

Regards,
Li​
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.