Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: core: Wait for device link removals before dropping genpd->dev
Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 16:30:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPx+jO_dACmFfdy6v32=V31HYiBFeU0NpnvhVuFWvLQ0Ls845g@mail.gmail.com> |
+ Saravana, Rafael, Danilo On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 12:21 PM jaseg <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Jan Sebastian Götte <[email protected]> > > genpd->dev is embedded in struct generic_pm_domain and its release > function is empty, so providers free the containing genpd with a plain > kfree() once of_genpd_remove_last() returns, ignoring its refcount. Yes, there is certainly room for improvements in regards to reference counting and freeing data in genpd. It's moving slowly in the right direction though. Anyway, the release function is actually set to genpd_provider_release(), which ideally should free the data in the long run, but we haven't fully reached that point yet. That said, I guess you actually are referring to the ->remove() callback for the genpd_provider_drv, right? > > Since genpd->dev is registered on the genpd provider bus, fw_devlink > creates device links to it, and those are torn down asynchronously. > Nothing made genpd_remove() wait for those teardowns, so the provider > could free the memory backing genpd->dev while the queued workers still > used it. > > This is reachable at boot on qrb2210, where the firmware rejects PC mode > and psci_cpuidle_domain_probe() removes all the CPU PM domains before > returning -EPROBE_DEFER. The bug is asymptomatic on defconfig, but shows > up when enabling KASAN or INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON. In some builds, it > causes the kernel to crash a few hundred ms into the boot. > > Call device_link_wait_removal() before dropping the final reference. All > link removal work is queued from device_del(), via > device_links_driver_cleanup() and device_links_purge(), which precedes > genpd_free_data(), and flush_workqueue() waits for it to complete. > > Note: This patch was LLM-assisted. I reproduced the issue and tested > this patch on hardware, and I did my best to verify it by hand. However, > I'm far from an expert in pmdomain, so YMMV. > > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-5-opus > Fixes: 18a3a510ecfd ("pmdomain: core: Add the genpd->dev to the genpd provider bus") > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Jan Sebastian Götte <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/pmdomain/core.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/core.c b/drivers/pmdomain/core.c > index 842c4169e290..4eeb980e5a40 100644 > --- a/drivers/pmdomain/core.c > +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/core.c > @@ -2348,6 +2348,9 @@ static int genpd_alloc_data(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > static void genpd_free_data(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > { > + /* Pending device link removals still reference genpd->dev. */ > + device_link_wait_removal(); > + Even if this fixes the issue, it looks wrong to me that drivers should have to deal with this themselves at device removal. In other words, I was expecting the driver core to deal with this for everyone, but that seems not to be the case. Hmm. Note that, the device removal should typically happen when the genpd provider calls of_genpd_del_provider() and it calls device_del(). > put_device(&genpd->dev); > if (genpd->device_id != -ENXIO) > ida_free(&genpd_ida, genpd->device_id); > -- > 2.53.0 > I will have a closer look at the driver core for this. In the meantime, maybe Saravana, Rafael or Danilo have some ideas already? Kind regards Uffe