Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,shikra-pas: Allow bam-dmux subnode

Vishnu Santhosh <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 20:48:41 +0530
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-remoteproc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 30-07-2026 12:53 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 02:21:01PM +0530, Vishnu Santhosh wrote:
>> The BAM-DMUX node lives as a direct child of the modem PAS remoteproc
> No, it does not. Look:
>
>    $  git describe
>    next-20260729
>    $ git grep bam-dmux
>    No child node shown

The commit message overstated this. The dt changes are yet to be merged.
I'll correct it in v3.

>
> Why isn't this part of Shikra remoteproc commit/patch? How any code
> could pass validation otherwise?

By the time the BAM-DMUX support was brought up and validated, the
remoteproc changes was already in a stable state. Therefore, the
bam-dmux change is being submitted separately.

>> node, but qcom,shikra-pas.yaml has unevaluatedProperties: false and
>> does not list bam-dmux, so any DT adding this subnode fails schema
>> validation.
> Fails how? How can I reproduce the error?
>
> There is no bam-dma in this binding example.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Did you mean bam-dmux (the property this patch adds)? If so, I'll add
an example with a bam-dmux subnode in v3.


Thanks,
Vishnu