Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Maili SoC compatible
Yijie Yang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/19/2026 2:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/08/2026 08:28, Yijie Yang wrote: >> >> >> On 8/19/2026 2:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 19/08/2026 07:42, Prasad Kumpatla wrote: >>>> From: Yijie Yang <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Add the qcom,maili SoC compatible string to the QCOM SoC bindings. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yijie Yang <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 3 +++ >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>> index ff8a35df7862..00d9a493fe76 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>>> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ properties: >>>> - qcom,kaanapali-qrd >>>> - const: qcom,kaanapali >>>> >>>> + - items: >>>> + - const: qcom,maili >>> >>> Heh? This cannot go alone. >> >> Keep only the SoC compatible string and exclude the board for now, as >> the latter is not currently used. >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260622-brainy-rapid-tody-dd7c3a@quoll/ > > No, read my message there - this should be rejected! I even wrote: > > "But if ever this commit is used in argument "oh, compatible without > user was accepted here by Krzysztof, so I can do the same", I will > simply NAK such future contribution without reading the rest." > > So NAK because you did not even bother to read what I already stated! In patch 2/2, pd-mapper serves as the user. Is there any other reason to reject this binding? > > Best regards, > Krzysztof -- Best Regards, Yijie