Re: argc/argv

> I am trying to build a system that needs to pick up the command line
> arguments.  However, it seems there are two ways to do it.

No, there's only one.

> The old way is that argc and argv elements are on the stack.

And that's the correct way.

> Using gcc 3.4.3, the argc is edi and the pointer for argv is in esi,
> according to the times that I have tried it.
>
> Is this correct????

No. Maybe argc really is in edi and argv in esi, but it can change anytime. 
Without warning. You shouldn't ever depend on it. Also, I believe this 
behavior should be attributed to both glibc and gcc (and therefore can change 
when version of either changes).

Marcin Kościelnicki




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Toshiba i FIFA World Cup
Wygraj bilety i notebooki z Intel Centrino Duo Mobile Technology
http://link.interia.pl/f1912

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-assembly" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html