Re: CPU cores...
"Hendrik Visage" <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:23:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-assembly |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/16/07, Henio Paszczak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes .. I understand that kernel is controlling that > everything, but for sure there is some linux system > call which give possibility to load secund core > another thread, to synchronize this processes and so > one. Any way .. some body had to write the kernel and > give it "power" to decide which core to use ( of > course i can read kernel source and for sure i will, > but now i don't have enough time :) ) SOlaris gives you (the system administrator/programmer/etc) the ability to bind (using pbind) a process (not sure about threads, but it might be possible too) to a specific CPU/core. I still haven't played enough on multiple core Linux servers to have a need for that facility/function :( as I've found that the kernel's scheduling is mostly adequate enough once I've threaded/forked of the correct number of threads/processes for the available CPUs/cores. ... so for > example i want to create binary file .. program which > doing some computation on both cores, put it to > diskette boot block and restart system. There is no > linux and other os I can use only bios system calls > etc. and there is for sure some method to take control > over both cores. > Lukas Check on ACPI and I think MPI (I believe 1.4 is the later version) that tells you about these CPUs/cores etc. Then use the bus locking instructions for synchronization and protection of critical stages/areas in your code. Again these principles are described in most text books on process/thread synchronization, it's just the assembler codes that different from CPU to CPU ;^P -- Hendrik Visage