Re: writing a jump table
Nicolas Bock <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:26:07 -0600
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-assembly |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD49A755D11EEDD40F046924A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But how does non-PIC code where it is in memory? When I disassemble the non-PIC version, the address space starts at 0 which must mean that the linker relocates the code. Also, labels represent offsets if I understand this correctly, which is also a relative address and not an absolute. That's what I meant with that I don't fully understand why these extra hoops are necessary. On 03/16/11 20:23, Brian Raiter wrote: >> I think I figured it out now. I used gcc to compile PIC for the C >> switch statement and checked what it does. I don't fully understand >> it to be honest, but it seems to do the job also for non PIC code. >=20 > Of course -- PIC code just means that the code doesn't assume it knows > where it's located in memory, which for a shared-object library is a > necessary thing. It does mean the code has to jump through a few more > hoops, which is why the compiler doesn't make it the default. >=20 > b --------------enigD49A755D11EEDD40F046924A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2BcT8ACgkQf15tZKyRylJD6QCg69LYd7W7reoH07I4vpll6/H7 2vwAnR77rm/hcQjeO0tYPIMdYVb9vqjL =W2BP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD49A755D11EEDD40F046924A--