Re: [PATCH 02/17] block: add a bdev_rw_virt helper
Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.gfs2,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/22/25 16:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Add a helper to perform synchronous I/O on a kernel direct map range. > Currently this is implemented in various places in usually not very > efficient ways, so provide a generic helper instead. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > --- > block/bio.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/bio.h | 5 ++++- > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c > index 4e6c85a33d74..a6a867a432cf 100644 > --- a/block/bio.c > +++ b/block/bio.c > @@ -1301,6 +1301,36 @@ int submit_bio_wait(struct bio *bio) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio_wait); > > +/** > + * bdev_rw_virt - synchronously read into / write from kernel mapping > + * @bdev: block device to access > + * @sector: sector to accasse > + * @data: data to read/write > + * @len: length to read/write > + * @op: operation (e.g. REQ_OP_READ/REQ_OP_WRITE) > + * > + * Performs synchronous I/O to @bdev for @data/@len. @data must be in > + * the kernel direct mapping and not a vmalloc address. > + */ > +int bdev_rw_virt(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, void *data, > + size_t len, enum req_op op) > +{ > + struct bio_vec bv; > + struct bio bio; > + int error; > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(is_vmalloc_addr(data))) > + return -EIO; > + > + bio_init(&bio, bdev, &bv, 1, op); > + bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = sector; > + bio_add_virt_nofail(&bio, data, len); > + error = submit_bio_wait(&bio); > + bio_uninit(&bio); > + return error; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_rw_virt); > + > static void bio_wait_end_io(struct bio *bio) > { > complete(bio->bi_private); > diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h > index 0678b67162ee..17a10220c57d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/bio.h > +++ b/include/linux/bio.h > @@ -402,7 +402,6 @@ static inline int bio_iov_vecs_to_alloc(struct iov_iter *iter, int max_segs) > > struct request_queue; > > -extern int submit_bio_wait(struct bio *bio); > void bio_init(struct bio *bio, struct block_device *bdev, struct bio_vec *table, > unsigned short max_vecs, blk_opf_t opf); > extern void bio_uninit(struct bio *); > @@ -434,6 +433,10 @@ static inline void bio_add_virt_nofail(struct bio *bio, void *vaddr, > __bio_add_page(bio, virt_to_page(vaddr), len, offset_in_page(vaddr)); > } > > +int submit_bio_wait(struct bio *bio); > +int bdev_rw_virt(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, void *data, > + size_t len, enum req_op op); > + > int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter); > void bio_iov_bvec_set(struct bio *bio, const struct iov_iter *iter); > void __bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio, bool mark_dirty); Any specific reason why the declaration of 'submit_bio_wait()' is moved? Other than that: Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich