Re: [PATCH v2] bcache: add "clock" cache replacement policy
Robert Pang <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:06:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJhEC05VTcS-=jsDUoyybQ5Cc33DbPXqJ=5FxfVxo06xfugwAQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Apology for missing the change log earlier: v2: Add "clock" cache replacement policy to admin-guide/bcache.rst and performance results. v1: initial version. On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 12:17 AM Robert Pang <[email protected]> wrote: > > This new policy extends the FIFO policy to approximate the classic clock policy > (O(n) time complexity) by considering bucket priority, similar to the LRU > policy. > > This clock policy addresses the high IO latency (1-2 seconds) experienced on > multi-terabyte cache devices when the free list is empty due to the default LRU > policy. The LRU policy's O(n log n) complexity for sorting priorities for the > entire bucket list causes this delay. > > Here are the average execution times (in microseconds) of the LRU and the clock > replacement policies: > > SSD Size Bucket Count LRU (us) Clock (us) > 375 GB 1536000 58292 1163 > 750 GB 3072000 121769 1729 > 1.5 TB 6144000 244012 3862 > 3 TB 12288000 496569 6428 > 6 TB 24576000 1067628 14298 > 9 TB 36864000 1564348 25763 > > Signed-off-by: Robert Pang <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/bcache.rst | 2 +- > drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/md/bcache/bcache_ondisk.h | 1 + > drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/bcache.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/bcache.rst > index 6fdb495ac466..2be2999c7de4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/bcache.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bcache.rst > @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ bucket_size > Size of buckets > > cache_replacement_policy > - One of either lru, fifo or random. > + One of either lru, fifo, random or clock. > > discard > Boolean; if on a discard/TRIM will be issued to each bucket before it is > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c > index 48ce750bf70a..c65c48eab169 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c > @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ > #include <linux/random.h> > #include <trace/events/bcache.h> > > -#define MAX_OPEN_BUCKETS 128 > +#define MAX_OPEN_BUCKETS 128 > +#define CHECK_PRIO_SLICES 16 > > /* Bucket heap / gen */ > > @@ -211,19 +212,41 @@ static void invalidate_buckets_lru(struct cache *ca) > } > } > > -static void invalidate_buckets_fifo(struct cache *ca) > +/* > + * When check_prio is true, this FIFO policy examines the priority of the > + * buckets and invalidates only the ones below a threshold in the priority > + * ladder. As it goes, the threshold will be raised if not enough buckets are > + * invalidated. Empty buckets are also invalidated. This evaulation resembles > + * the LRU policy, and is used to approximate the classic clock-sweep cache > + * replacement algorithm. > + */ > +static void invalidate_buckets_fifo(struct cache *ca, bool check_prio) > { > struct bucket *b; > size_t checked = 0; > + size_t check_quota = 0; > + uint16_t prio_threshold = ca->set->min_prio; > > while (!fifo_full(&ca->free_inc)) { > if (ca->fifo_last_bucket < ca->sb.first_bucket || > ca->fifo_last_bucket >= ca->sb.nbuckets) > ca->fifo_last_bucket = ca->sb.first_bucket; > > + if (check_prio && checked >= check_quota) { > + BUG_ON(ca->set->min_prio > INITIAL_PRIO); > + prio_threshold += > + DIV_ROUND_UP(INITIAL_PRIO - ca->set->min_prio, > + CHECK_PRIO_SLICES); > + check_quota += DIV_ROUND_UP(ca->sb.nbuckets, > + CHECK_PRIO_SLICES); > + } > + > b = ca->buckets + ca->fifo_last_bucket++; > > - if (bch_can_invalidate_bucket(ca, b)) > + if (bch_can_invalidate_bucket(ca, b) && > + (!check_prio || > + b->prio <= prio_threshold || > + !GC_SECTORS_USED(b))) > bch_invalidate_one_bucket(ca, b); > > if (++checked >= ca->sb.nbuckets) { > @@ -269,11 +292,14 @@ static void invalidate_buckets(struct cache *ca) > invalidate_buckets_lru(ca); > break; > case CACHE_REPLACEMENT_FIFO: > - invalidate_buckets_fifo(ca); > + invalidate_buckets_fifo(ca, false); > break; > case CACHE_REPLACEMENT_RANDOM: > invalidate_buckets_random(ca); > break; > + case CACHE_REPLACEMENT_CLOCK: > + invalidate_buckets_fifo(ca, true); > + break; > } > } > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache_ondisk.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache_ondisk.h > index 6620a7f8fffc..d45794e01fe1 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache_ondisk.h > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache_ondisk.h > @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ BITMASK(CACHE_REPLACEMENT, struct cache_sb, flags, 2, 3); > #define CACHE_REPLACEMENT_LRU 0U > #define CACHE_REPLACEMENT_FIFO 1U > #define CACHE_REPLACEMENT_RANDOM 2U > +#define CACHE_REPLACEMENT_CLOCK 3U > > BITMASK(BDEV_CACHE_MODE, struct cache_sb, flags, 0, 4); > #define CACHE_MODE_WRITETHROUGH 0U > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c > index 826b14cae4e5..c8617bad0648 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static const char * const cache_replacement_policies[] = { > "lru", > "fifo", > "random", > + "clock", > NULL > }; > > -- > 2.51.0.710.ga91ca5db03-goog >