Re: [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io"
Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jan 2026 05:18:15 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-block |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:51:46AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:34:18AM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > Coly and I were just on a call discussing updating my old test suite. I > > haven't used the bcache tests in > 10 years so they do need to be > > updated, but the harness and related tooling is well supported both for > > local development and has full CI. > > > > https://evilpiepirate.org/git/ktest.git/tree/README.md > > https://evilpiepirate.org/git/ktest.git/tree/tests/bcache/ > > I just quickly look at the tests and I got the impression some of those > tests could be added to blktests. blktests is run by various people, > thus bcache would get some basic test exposure, e.g. in linux-next. ktest has features that blktests/fstests don't - it's a full testrunner, with a CI and test dashboard, with subtest level sharding that runs on entire cluster. What would make sense would be for ktest to wrap blktests, like it already does fstests.