Re: [PATCH 4/4] bio: use bio_io_error more often
"Coly Li" <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Mar 2026 22:32:13 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.drbd-dev,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 08:04:09PM +0800, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Instead of setting bio->bi_status to BLK_STS_IOERR and calling > bio_endio(bio), use the shorthand bio_io_error(bio). > > Created with Coccinelle using the following semantic patch: > > @@ > struct bio *bio; > @@ > - bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR; > - bio_endio(bio); > + bio_io_error(bio); > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > --- > block/fops.c | 3 +-- > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 3 +-- > drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 3 +-- > drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 6 ++---- > drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 3 +-- > drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 3 +-- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +-- > 7 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > [snipped] > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h > index ec9ff9715081..e0c9d9eef0a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h > @@ -947,8 +947,7 @@ static inline void closure_bio_submit(struct cache_set *c, > { > closure_get(cl); > if (unlikely(test_bit(CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE, &c->flags))) { > - bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR; > - bio_endio(bio); > + bio_io_error(bio); > return; > } > submit_bio_noacct(bio); > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c > index 3fa3b13a410f..0f6fa0a2920b 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c > @@ -1178,8 +1178,7 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio) > > if (unlikely((d->c && test_bit(CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE, &d->c->flags)) || > dc->io_disable)) { > - bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR; > - bio_endio(bio); > + bio_io_error(bio); > return; > } > > @@ -1283,8 +1282,7 @@ void flash_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio) > struct bcache_device *d = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->private_data; > > if (unlikely(d->c && test_bit(CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE, &d->c->flags))) { > - bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR; > - bio_endio(bio); > + bio_io_error(bio); > return; > } > For bcache part, I feel current hard code is explict and clear. The bio_io_error() wrapper is not so directly understood. This is just my opinion, not a strong objection. Thanks. Coly Li [snipped]