Re: [PATCH v3] bcache: avoid holding bch_register_lock across cache_set recovery
"Coly Li" <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Jul 2026 19:35:23 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 04:49:07PM +0800, Jing Wu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 04:25:23PM +0800, Coly Li wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:08:59PM +0800, Qiliang Yuan wrote: > > > Large-scale bcache device registration and concurrent sysfs access can > > > hang unrelated tasks for a long time, e.g.: > > > > > [snipped] > > > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Qiliang Yuan <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Jing Wu <[email protected]> > > > > I just realize this patch was sent out by Qiliang Yuan, but the > > email address is from [email protected] which owned by Jing Wu. > > > > How and why does this happen? > > Jing Wu and Qiliang Yuan are on the same team. The git send-email > configuration was mixed up when preparing this submission, and the > patch ended up going out under the wrong author address. Apologies > for the confusion. > > The solution itself is the result of team collaboration: both of > us worked on the analysis, design, implementation and testing, so > both Signed-off-bys are correct and intentional. > It seems all patches authored by Qiliang Yuan used [email protected] as the email address, even your name didn't show up in the patches. Since you and Qiliang are in same team, why you didn't use chinatelecom.cn email address in your SOB ? This is not a common situation, so I need to make it clear for the supply chain security reason. Thanks. Coly Li