Re: [PATCH v2] bcachefs: Use user_backed_iter instead of iter_is_iovec

On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 02:16:35AM +0800, Alan Huang wrote:
> ITER_UBUF is also one of the user backed iter, which is equivalent
> of single-segment iovec. DIO handling should use user_backed_iter.

Applied...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> V2: imporve commit message
> 
> 
>  fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c b/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c
> index 1f5154d9676b..6fdc477c81af 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int bch2_direct_IO_read(struct kiocb *req, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  	 * the dirtying of requests that are internal from the kernel (i.e. from
>  	 * loopback), because we'll deadlock on page_lock.
>  	 */
> -	dio->should_dirty = iter_is_iovec(iter);
> +	dio->should_dirty = user_backed_iter(iter);
>  
>  	blk_start_plug(&plug);
>  
> -- 
> 2.48.1
>