Re: [PATCH] Documentation: bcachefs: Add explicit title for idle work design doc

Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:08:22 -0400
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-bcachefs,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <p7ocizi2jg36uvk64yy5mv5bzg3dyrvnosz5mhj5j373tzr7iz@txx5juyvhwzf>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 07:22:18AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Commit 9e260e4590e044 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc")
> adds design doc (desiderata) for idle work scheduling, but missed
> explicit title, causing its two section headings to be toctree entries
> instead.
> 
> Add the title.
> 
> Fixes: 9e260e4590e0 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc")
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> index 59a332509dcd97..30f2844c3d9e5e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -Idle/background work classes design doc:
> +Idle/background work classes desiderata

.....
what's going on with that spelling?

> +=======================================
>  
>  Right now, our behaviour at idle isn't ideal, it was designed for servers that
>  would be under sustained load, to keep pending work at a "medium" level, to
> 
> base-commit: 37c52167b007d9d0bb8c5ed53dd6efc4969a1356
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
>