Re: [PATCH] Documentation: bcachefs: Add explicit title for idle work design doc
Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2025 22:31:43 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-bcachefs,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <yyqgq3brwrstiaqydzv4ua5syesrg4gh7w4uhtwg3flhuxa4ji@7xciwgaluwux> |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:29:19AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:08:22PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > -Idle/background work classes design doc: > > > +Idle/background work classes desiderata > > > > ..... > > what's going on with that spelling? > > I'm just suggesting a better title, though. Should I keep it or revert back > to design doc? Revert back to design doc, please. (I genuinely had not seen that word before; usually prefer to keep things simple).