Re: [PATCH] ublk: remove WARN_ON_ONCE() in ublk_unmap_io()

Ming Lei <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 21:47:31 -0500
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CACVXFVOaA_k+TCmeyrjguW5StdDb=zQsTCXWMBQ7QiNX1wuDzA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 11:24 AM Caleb Sander Mateos
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> io->res is set from struct ublksrv_io_cmd's result field, which is
> controlled by the ublk server process, without any validation. It's thus
> possible for userspace to trigger the io->res > rq_bytes warning.
> ublk_copy_user_pages() already limits the copy length to the request
> data length, so drop the warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 4ca6ec738c93..4f30644756df 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -1492,12 +1492,10 @@ static unsigned int ublk_unmap_io(bool need_map,
>
>         if (ublk_need_unmap_req(req)) {
>                 struct iov_iter iter;
>                 const int dir = ITER_SOURCE;
>
> -               WARN_ON_ONCE(io->res > rq_bytes);
> -
>                 import_ubuf(dir, u64_to_user_ptr(io->buf.addr), io->res, &iter);
>                 return ublk_copy_user_pages(req, 0, &iter, dir);
>         }
>         return rq_bytes;

The change may be fine, however access_ok() still can fail from import_ubuf(),
so can we consolidate ublk_unmap_io() a bit?


Thanks,
Ming Lei