Re: [PATCH v15 0/8] blk: honor isolcpus configuration

On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 05:20:45PM +0300, Ionut Nechita (Wind River) wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
> 
> We're tracking this series downstream -- the managed_irq best-effort
> gap for blk-mq/NVMe queue mapping is exactly the limitation we hit on
> PREEMPT_RT telecom controllers with narrow housekeeping pools (GNR-D
> 144T, most cores isolated, 24 ice PFs + 2 NVMe).
> 
> When the next revision lands (with the naming/integration changes from
> Sebastian's and Marco's feedback), we'd be happy to test it on that
> hardware and report back with effective_affinity + NVMe queue mapping
> data.
> 
> Thanks for driving this forward.
> 
> Ionut

Hi Ionut,

Thank you! I would appreciate that.

Kind reards,
-- 
Aaron Tomlin