Re: [PATCH blktests 0/2] Test multipath and marginal ports

Jesse Taube <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme
Message-ID <CADRr4beUeZo9ZA9TZVmWQ9Vegm2LvTXkW0wGNxYA6_7z_njMEA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 7:25 AM Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jesse, thanks for the patches.
>
> On Aug 12, 2026 / 13:45, Jesse Taube wrote:
> > Tests for the upcoming nvme-fc: FPIN link integrity handling set.
>
> I assume that above refers to this kernel patch series.
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/[email protected]/

Yes it does

>
> I applied the series on top of v7.2-rc7 kernel. Then I ran the test case added
> by this blktests series and observed the failurea below:
>
> nvme/070 (tr=fc) (test nvme-fc marginal path handling)       [failed]
>     runtime  33.581s  ...  33.028s
>     --- tests/nvme/070.out      2026-08-14 12:03:21.338000000 +0900
>     +++ /home/shin/Blktests/blktests/results/nodev_tr_fc/nvme/070.out.bad       2026-08-14 20:17:04.731000000 +0900
>     @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
>      Starting background I/O
>      Testing iopolicy: numa
>      Changing FC links to online
>     -Set all online: pass
>     +No FC ports are being used, expected atleast one in use when all are online in numa mode.
>     +Set all online: fail
>      One host marginal: pass
>     ...
>     (Run 'diff -u tests/nvme/070.out /home/shin/Blktests/blktests/results/nodev_tr_fc/nvme/070.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
>
> Is this failure expected?

No. I can't reproduce the issue either.
Does this happen consistently?
Maybe the links are still connecting?

Thanks for you review I will implement the changes you recomend.

Thanks,
Jesse Taube

>
> I will comment on each patch in line.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.