Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: skip the blkcg walk in blk_cgroup_congested() when nothing is throttled

Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 09:56:36AM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
> blk_cgroup_congested() walks the current task's blkcg ancestor chain on every
> readahead decision and, once swap is in use, on every anonymous and shmem
> folio allocation.  The answer is almost always "no", but finding that out
> costs two loads per level on two cold cache lines, plus an out-of-line
> kthread_blkcg() and an RCU read-side pair.  On a fleet profile of hosts
> running containers with 5-10 level hierarchies it costs about as much as all
> of mutex_lock(), 99.4% of it under __folio_throttle_swaprate().
> 
> Patch 3 gates the walk on a global count of blkcgs with a non-zero
> congestion_count, so the common case is a load and a predicted branch.
> 
> That only works if the count is correctly maintained, currently two teardown
> paths can leave a blkcg permanently marked congested.  Today that only hurts
> tasks in the affected cgroup, but it hurts them for the life of the cgroup -
> readahead cut to a single page, async readahead skipped, and a throttle
> scheduled on every anonymous folio allocation.  With a global gate it would
> cost every other task on the machine the walk as well.  Patches 1 and 2 fix
> those two paths and stand on their own as bugfixes; patch 3 depends on them.

For the series,

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.