Re: [PATCH] nbd: don't warn when reclassifying a busy socket lock

On Sun,  2 Aug 2026 16:19:20 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:53:37 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote:
>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:39:17 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote:
>>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:23:43 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote:
>>>>On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:29 PM Hillf Danton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> For archive purpose, syzbot report [1] where udp was not invovled defies
>>>>> what is fixed in d532cddb6c60 ("nbd: Reclassify sockets to avoid lockdep
>>>>> circular dependency") -- "Since the UDP socket and the NBD TCP/TLS socket
>>>>> are different, this is a false positive."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] Subject: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in inet_shutdown (3)
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>>>>>
>>>>For archive purpose, syzbot report [2] shows deadlock without either udp or
>>>>tcp invovled. But it sounds false positive because kernfs node is removed
>>>>while the filesystem is filling super block.
>>>>
>>>>[2] Subject: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_remove_by_name_ns (2)
>>>>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>>>>
>>>For archive purpose, syzbot reports [3,4] show deadlock without either udp or
>>>tcp invovled.
>>>
>>>[3] Subject: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_iop_permission (2)
>>>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>>>
>>>[4] Subject: [syzbot] [kernel?] possible deadlock in netif_reset_xps_queues_gt (3)
>>>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>>>
>>For archive purpose, syzbot report [5] shows deadlock without lock_sock invovled.
>>
>>[5] Subject: [syzbot] [pm?] possible deadlock in thermal_zone_device_set_mode
>>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>>
>For archive purpose, syzbot report [6] shows deadlock without nbd invovled.
>
>[6] Subject: [syzbot] [block?] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in blkcg_deactivate_policy (2)
>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>
For archive purpose, syzbot report [7] shows deadlock without socket invovled.

[7] Subject: [syzbot] [block?] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in blkg_conf_prep
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

BTW do you still have any interest/minute fixing it Eric?