Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] blktrace: differentiate between blk_io_trace versions
Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:21:34 +0900
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-btrace,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Western Digital Research |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/26/25 00:02, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Differentiate between blk_io_trace and blk_io_trace2 when relaying to > user-space depending on which version has been requested by the blktrace > utility. > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> > --- > kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > index 9cd8eb9e7b4b..82ad626d6202 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > @@ -91,6 +91,29 @@ static void record_blktrace_event(struct blk_io_trace *t, pid_t pid, int cpu, > memcpy((void *)t + sizeof(*t) + cgid_len, pdu_data, pdu_len); > } > > +static void record_blktrace_event2(struct blk_io_trace2 *t2, pid_t pid, int cpu, > + sector_t sector, int bytes, u64 what, > + dev_t dev, int error, u64 cgid, > + ssize_t cgid_len, void *pdu_data, > + int pdu_len) > + Extra blank line not needed. > +{ > + t2->pid = pid; > + t2->cpu = cpu; > + > + t2->sector = sector; > + t2->bytes = bytes; > + t2->action = what; > + t2->device = dev; > + t2->error = error; > + t2->pdu_len = pdu_len + cgid_len; > + > + if (cgid_len) > + memcpy((void *)t2 + sizeof(*t2), &cgid, cgid_len); > + if (pdu_len) > + memcpy((void *)t2 + sizeof(*t2) + cgid_len, pdu_data, pdu_len); > +} > + > static void relay_blktrace_event(struct blk_trace *bt, unsigned long sequence, > pid_t pid, int cpu, sector_t sector, int bytes, > u32 what, int error, u64 cgid, > @@ -111,6 +134,26 @@ static void relay_blktrace_event(struct blk_trace *bt, unsigned long sequence, > cgid, cgid_len, pdu_data, pdu_len); > } > > +static void relay_blktrace_event2(struct blk_trace *bt, unsigned long sequence, > + pid_t pid, int cpu, sector_t sector, > + int bytes, u64 what, int error, u64 cgid, > + ssize_t cgid_len, void *pdu_data, int pdu_len) > +{ > + struct blk_io_trace2 *t; > + size_t trace_len = sizeof(struct blk_io_trace2) + pdu_len + cgid_len; > + > + t = relay_reserve(bt->rchan, trace_len); > + if (!t) > + return; > + > + t->magic = BLK_IO_TRACE_MAGIC | BLK_IO_TRACE2_VERSION; > + t->sequence = sequence; > + t->time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()); > + > + record_blktrace_event2(t, pid, cpu, sector, bytes, what, bt->dev, error, > + cgid, cgid_len, pdu_data, pdu_len); > +} See below. > + > /* > * Send out a notify message. > */ > @@ -146,8 +189,12 @@ static void trace_note(struct blk_trace *bt, pid_t pid, int action, > if (!bt->rchan) > return; > > - relay_blktrace_event(bt, 0, pid, cpu, 0, 0, action, 0, cgid, > - cgid_len, (void *)data, len); > + if (bt->version == 1) > + relay_blktrace_event(bt, 0, pid, cpu, 0, 0, action, 0, cgid, > + cgid_len, (void *)data, len); > + else > + relay_blktrace_event2(bt, 0, pid, cpu, 0, 0, action, 0, cgid, > + cgid_len, (void *)data, len); Since you pass bt pointer to the relay function, the version is known in that function and this could be done inside it, no ? That would avoid this if repetition. > } > > /* > @@ -329,9 +376,14 @@ static void __blk_add_trace(struct blk_trace *bt, sector_t sector, int bytes, > local_irq_save(flags); > sequence = per_cpu_ptr(bt->sequence, cpu); > (*sequence)++; > - relay_blktrace_event(bt, *sequence, pid, cpu, sector, bytes, > - lower_32_bits(what), error, cgid, cgid_len, > - pdu_data, pdu_len); > + if (bt->version == 1) > + relay_blktrace_event(bt, *sequence, pid, cpu, sector, bytes, > + lower_32_bits(what), error, cgid, > + cgid_len, pdu_data, pdu_len); > + else > + relay_blktrace_event2(bt, *sequence, pid, cpu, sector, bytes, > + what, error, cgid, cgid_len, pdu_data, > + pdu_len); > local_irq_restore(flags); > } > -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research