Re: [BUG] two raid consistency bugs
Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
在 2026/7/15 19:37, Zhang Boyang 写道: > Hi, > > On 2026/7/15 17:44, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> Personally I like the idea of turning metadata trees into merkle >>> trees (so I wrote it first). But since you are the maintainer, I will >>> let you decide which way is appropriate. >> >> I'm not the maintainer, I just default to not trust ideas/features >> from unproven contributors, especially when the idea/feature is not >> simple. >> >> Especially considering the increased patches generated by LLMs. >> > > I understand your concern. > >> >> So my suggestion is, if you really want to do long-term contributions, >> stop coming up with fancy ideas, start from basics like doing proper >> fstests runs with various combinations, report real bugs and fix >> simple ones by yourself. >> >> Earn your name first then consider fancy ideas. >> > > That's exactly what I'm doing. I'm not requesting devs to fix this bug > immediately or implement my fancy idea. I wrote two test cases and hope > it will be helpful to btrfs development. It would be better if these two > test cases can be merged to test suite. No, we will not push for test cases without a fix. There is already a known failure, generic/747, and at least I'm not the only one regretting pushing that. > > I even wrote a draft patch to fix the second bug. However, the first bug > is not easily solvable. So I had to discuss possible solutions. If > possible, I would have written a draft patch for the first bug, too. This is already what I call fancy ideas. Anyway, this will mostly just get yourself ignored if you really choose to start from fancy projects. Those long existing problems are still there for a reason. If you believe you're smarter than everyone else, then go ahead, no one is going to make you change your mind. > > > Zhang Boyang