Re: generic/633, generic/696, generic/697 failure on btrfs with rc2/rc3
Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.fstests,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My bad, forgot to Cc fstests.
在 2026/7/17 16:27, Qu Wenruo 写道:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like 539dce114465 ("fs: refuse O_TMPFILE creation with an
> unmapped fsuid or fsgid") has changed the behavior that the above tests
> will fail on btrfs/ext4/xfs:
>
> FSTYP -- ext4
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 btrfs-vm 7.2.0-rc3-custom+ #411 SMP
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Jul 17 16:24:34 ACST 2026
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -F /dev/mapper/test-scratch1
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 /mnt/scratch
>
> generic/633 1s ... - output mismatch (see /home/adam/xfstests/results//
> generic/633.out.bad)
> --- tests/generic/633.out 2022-05-11 11:25:30.816666664 +0930
> +++ /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/633.out.bad 2026-07-17
> 16:25:45.033967541 +0930
> @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
> QA output created by 633
> Silence is golden
> +utils.c: 948: openat_tmpfile_supported - Value too large for
> defined data type - failure: create
> +utils.c: 948: openat_tmpfile_supported - Value too large for
> defined data type - failure: create
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u /home/adam/xfstests/tests/generic/633.out /home/adam/
> xfstests/results//generic/633.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
> Ran: generic/633
> Failures: generic/633
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
>
> Did a quick search but didn't hit an exact fix.
>
> I guess we need to update the test case to avoid the EOVERFLOW errors?
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>