Re: printf and long double [SOLVED]
Nanakos Chrysostomos <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:18:22 +0300
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-c-programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Problem Solved:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
int main(void)
{
_Decimal128 a = log(8.25123456);
printf("%.62Lf\n",(long double)a);
return 0;
}
Thanks for your replies.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:03:27PM +0300, Bogdan Cristea wrote:
> On Monday 04 October 2010 14:54:46 you wrote:
> > I wish I could get 24 decimal digits precision with the current long
> > double (80-bit). I can't get more than 15 digits even in a simple division.
> > I think that the extended-precision can't give more than 19 decimal
> > digits of precision (log(10,2^64)=19.2). The quadruple precision can
> > give at most 34 decimal digits (log(10,2^113)=34).
> >
> > Please consider the example below:
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > long double a = 1.0L/7.0L;
> > printf("%Lf\n",a);
> > --------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Can't get more than 15 digits precision....-:(
> > Is this a compiler problem or libc's problem? In x86_64 machines the
> > long double values supposed to give at least 106-bit precision even when
> > implemented in software. Is gcc compliant with the quadruple notation?
>
> Have you tried to specify manually the number of digits after the decimal
> point ?
>
> long double a = 1.0L/7.0L;
> printf("%'.100Lf\n",a);
>
> On a 64 bits machine the output is:
>
> 0.1428571428571428571409210675491330277964152628555893898010253906250000000000000000000000000000000000
>
> regards
> Bogdan