Re: duplicated modulo

"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:20:28 +0200
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-c-programming
Message-ID <op.vs9a4ecl3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:19:16 +0200, Nicolas Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote:

> * "Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]>:
>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:41:13 +0200, Nicolas Kaiser wrote:
>> > I'm curious: a duplicated modulo operation can't possibly make
>> > any difference, can it?
>> >
>> > diff -u -p ./arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/nvram.c
>> > /tmp/nothing/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/nvram.c
>> > --- ./arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/nvram.c	2011-03-31
>> > 09:52:41.674292401 +0200
>> > +++ /tmp/nothing/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/nvram.c
>> > @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ static u32 core99_calc_adler(u8 *buffer)
>> >  	high = 0;
>> >  	for (cnt=0; cnt<(NVRAM_SIZE-CORE99_ADLER_START); cnt++) {
>> >  		if ((cnt % 5000) == 0) {
>> > -			high  %= 65521UL;
>> >  			high %= 65521UL;
>> >  		}
>> >  		low += buffer[cnt];
>>
>> It's not just a module.  It's also an assignment.
>
> Sure. But I fail to see where between
>
> a %= b;
> a %= b;
>
> and
>
> a = (a % b) % b;
>
> and
>
> a %= b;
>
> would be a difference?

Ah, sorry, you are right.  I should stop responding to mail just
after waking up.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: [email protected]>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--