Re: [PATCH v3] tty: ldisc: fix deadlock between ldisc_sem and rtnl_mutex
"Zhou, Yun" <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:54:31 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-can,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-serial,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/30/2026 10:50 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 04:46:48PM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote: >> syzbot reported a circular lock dependency involving tty ldisc_sem and >> the networking rtnl_mutex. The full chain is: >> >> rtnl_mutex --> nft_commit_mutex --> ... --> ep->mtx --> ldisc_sem --> rtnl_mutex >> >> The last edge (ldisc_sem -> rtnl_mutex) is created because tty line >> discipline .open() callbacks (slcan, slip) call register_netdev() which >> acquires rtnl_mutex, and .open() runs under ldisc_sem write lock in >> tty_set_ldisc(). >> >> Fix by moving the .open() call outside the ldisc_sem write lock. The >> ldisc .open() is initialization of the NEW discipline after the old one >> has been closed - there is no need for ldisc_sem protection at this >> point since: >> >> - tty_lock is held throughout, preventing concurrent tty_set_ldisc, >> hangup, or close >> - tty->ldisc is set to NULL during the window. tty_ldisc_ref_wait() >> waits for the transition to complete. tty_ldisc_ref() returns NULL >> which callers already handle. >> - tty buffer data stays queued until the ldisc is installed >> >> The sequence becomes: >> 1. Hold ldisc_sem(write): close old ldisc, set tty->ldisc = NULL >> 2. Release ldisc_sem(write) >> 3. Call new_ldisc->ops->open() without ldisc_sem >> 4. Re-acquire ldisc_sem(write): install new ldisc (or restore old) >> 5. Release ldisc_sem(write) >> >> Reported-by: [email protected] >> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=de610eeef174bd59a8a3 >> Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <[email protected]> >> --- > > Sashiko has some comments: > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] > are they correct? > I've already responded to Sashiko about the "New issue" - this scenario does not exist [1] . I'm not sure why my reply didn't CC you - my bad. https://sashiko.dev/#/message/3894bbdd-1930-4ad4-8b28-431a162aece0%40windriver.com As for the pre-existing issue, it's very hard to trigger and practically impossible in real-world scenarios. If we really need to fix it, I'll send a separate patch series for it later. BR, Yun