Re: [PATCH 00/15] smb: add native security and trusted xattrs
Ralph Boehme <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I guess it's a property of the filesystem object anyway, and for objects that don't support them the server just returns the mode when queried, and fails when receiving set request. When crossing mountpoints this can always happen, both locally on the client, and on the server, so applications have to live with that. On 7/29/26 12:03 AM, Steve French wrote: > I agree - POSIX ACLs should be included in the updated version, but > interesting question is whether they could be made optional so as > server could support the Linux xattrs but not support POSIX ACLs > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 11:58 PM Ralph Boehme <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 7/28/26 2:35 AM, Steve French wrote: >>> What other protocol improvements should go into the new version of the protocol? >> POSIX ACLs end-to-end comes to mind. > > >
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEE+uLGCIokJSBRxVnkqh6bcSY5nkYFAmpyFnsFAwAAAAAACgkQqh6bcSY5nkaT MA//VCdQychbEwYwg5GP1r/NbIsY1b3s1P1/oqXiceze3uo/yj5+YqSD0xa+Qfra7xIbizoHzKyF gkeDo3fScDtxNB41bO4qf3BdHXOMbmJZ1gpk9zK5pvssCr0W3eyUZFkaFneAxr557O6arYVCtx8I jj9dF8BvKcnPB4FKCSdopoEc/U80PJIyjoSJHldYmBxzyDjM3mrHJKiabc2O65ULGB+z6SN++TBD 1gVdowSbziCqCdUcdk4bdnDnRsw/4KEeSfj1Ew3dMfWZp0aFZx7oh03yhnpMlPwqVTx7L1rFmcXC RcWFG4ObwYcEL5ZfwoR6DqpCS/jxYQ3Rb/Uw98t0KbipQvsVoLD+eHggvh8QowA4rcUhCRGcX5bD 6FCMK8vKAna813dvsDF+1uMI78PWFMKn0jODmkl0nAvXQ93B2OvDrb3Cf9sf1t/wty5/Ehv6uotd NQxSrEXAPhBh52zW0MWqFWhWnUAxE53AAZV+NgpxlvTKlj8qvBeoND2f9MDvP2DIjfF+C4Oz6qbI uldqFBIQdGNs+zcuqZP1ilo7CGB07CMiXkMSQch/pwDCU7PVCB/wj8L496w8OhN9cnDsoGyPDeDc jUDcD7M037a3v7hdIHfWvzLSWLc689bQbZRDzu7Pkq+aX51WT2yLSVPJop4J28wx3jbXtMJCLu+G dKE= =n+0y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----