Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] clk: ultrarisc: add DP1000 clock support

Jia Wang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <178467931058.4117678.1808952053832316217.b4-reply@b4>
On 2026-07-21 17:45 -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> Hi Jia,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 08:38:03AM +0800, Jia Wang via B4 Relay wrote:
> > This series exports a small common clock helper and adds the devicetree
> > binding and clock driver for the UltraRISC DP1000 SoC.
> > 
> > The clock tree is driven by a SYSPLL and provides fixed-factor clocks for
> > the subsystem and PCIe, divider-based root clocks for GMAC and the UART,
> > I2C, and SPI blocks, and per-instance gate clocks for UART0-3, I2C0-3,
> > and SPI0-1.
> > 
> > Testing:
> > - dt_binding_check and dtbs_check on ultrarisc,dp1000-clk
> > - Kernel build for RISC-V and boot-tested on DP1000
> > - Modules build test for CLK_ULTRARISC_DP1000
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jia Wang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Drop the initial clk_hw_get_rate() max-rate warning after setting the
> >   divider rate range.
> 
> I also see this in the diff between v3 and v4. Is this expected?
>

Yes, this is expected. The change only fixes the oddiv1/oddiv2 field naming
to match the hardware definition and does not affect PLL frequency
calculation.
 
>  +++ b/drivers/clk/ultrarisc/clk-dp1000.c
>  @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
> @@ -309,8 +309,8 @@
>  +	.frac_mask = GENMASK(23, 0),
>  +	.m_mask = GENMASK(23, 16),
>  +	.n_mask = GENMASK(11, 6),
> -+	.oddiv1_mask = GENMASK(4, 3),
> -+	.oddiv2_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> ++	.oddiv1_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> ++	.oddiv2_mask = GENMASK(4, 3),
> 
> Brian
> 
> 

Best regards,
Jia Wang
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.