Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: renesas: Split out RZ/T2H CPG binding

Hi Prabhakar,

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 at 13:14, Lad, Prabhakar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:53 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 20/07/2026 12:50, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 6:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > >>> From: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
> > >>>
> > >>> Move the RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H clock controller bindings from the generic
> > >>> renesas,cpg-mssr.yaml schema into a dedicated binding.
> > >>>
> > >>> Unlike the traditional Renesas CPG/MSSR block, the RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H
> > >>> system controller integrates additional functionality beyond clock and
> > >>> module-stop control, including reset control, clock monitor support,
> > >>> write-protection registers and other system management features.
> > >>
> > >> Nothing of above differences got reflected in the code, so I do not
> > >> understand this reasoning. Binding is exactly the same as the old one.
> > >>
> > > A syscon regmap is implemented [0] as part of the RZ/T2H CPG driver.
> > > Since the RZ/T2H clock driver uses this syscon wrapper, a function
> > > pointer is implemented to handle the RZ/T2H-specific configuration.
> > >
> > > Also, as the initial implementation used separate device tree nodes,
> > > Geert suggested splitting this binding schema off into a dedicated
> > > file [1].
> > >
> >
> > I still miss the difference. Can you point me (can be short diff) to
> > actual difference in this binding?
> >
> Fair enough! You're right that the schema text itself doesn't differ.
> I'll drop this patch in v4 and leave the bindings in
> renesas,cpg-mssr.yaml (unless Geert has a different opinion).

Given you no longer add a bunch of RZ/T2H-specific properties
and subnodes, I no longer see a reason for the split.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds