RE: [PATCH v13 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add Realtek RTD1625 Clock & Reset Controller
Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君] <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 12/08/2026 12:22, Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君] wrote: > >> On 12/08/2026 11:41, Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君] wrote: > >>> Hi Krzysztof, > >>> > >>>> On 12/08/2026 03:59, Yu-Chun Lin wrote: > >>>>> Add DT binding schema for Realtek RTD1625 clock and reset > >>>>> controller > >>>>> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> How my tag could appear here? > >>>> > >>>> Look: > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260324025332.3416977-2-eleanor.lin@r > >>>> ea > >>>> ltek.c > >>>> om/ > >>>> > >>>>> Co-developed-by: Cheng-Yu Lee <[email protected]> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yu Lee <[email protected]> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> Who added my tag? What is the actual flow of this patch? > >>>> > >>> > >>> You gave your Reviewed-by tag in v5. However, after that, Stephon > >>> provided additional feedback. In v6, I modified the patch based on > >>> Stephon's comments and made some other changes. Furthermore, I added > >>> the clock ID > >>> 144 in v11. > >> > >> So how my tag could appear before Cheng-Yu Lee signed off the patch? > >> > > > > Ah, I read the rules stating that "the last Signed-off-by: must always > > be that of the developer submitting the patch". > > This is correct interpretation (although some subsystems will interpret above > only in respect of other SoBs). > > > > > I mistakenly thought my Signed-off-by had to be the absolute last line > > of > > This is correct. > > > the entire commit message. Therefore, when I inserted your tag at the > > top of the tag block. > > This is odd result of earlier logic. If your SoB has to be the last, then obvious > choice is to put the Reviewed-by tag BEFORE your SoB. > > And in any case you should use b4 since it would do the correct thing. > All patch submissions are supposed to use b4, so you don't make trivial > process mistakes. > Thank you for the explanation. I'll learn how to use b4. Just to be sure I get it right: should I keep your tag and move it between my Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by, or should I drop it? Also, to make sure I follow the correct process and understand the clock maintainer's preference: Should I send a v14 to fix the tag, or is it possible for the clock maintainer to help amend this if there are no other changes? Best regards, Yu-Chun > > Best regards, > Krzysztof