RE: [PATCH v13 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add Realtek RTD1625 Clock & Reset Controller

Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君] <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On 12/08/2026 12:22, Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君] wrote:
> >> On 12/08/2026 11:41, Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君] wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>>> On 12/08/2026 03:59, Yu-Chun Lin wrote:
> >>>>> Add DT binding schema for Realtek RTD1625 clock and reset
> >>>>> controller
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>> How my tag could appear here?
> >>>>
> >>>> Look:
> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260324025332.3416977-2-eleanor.lin@r
> >>>> ea
> >>>> ltek.c
> >>>> om/
> >>>>
> >>>>> Co-developed-by: Cheng-Yu Lee <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yu Lee <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>> Who added my tag? What is the actual flow of this patch?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> You gave your Reviewed-by tag in v5. However, after that, Stephon
> >>> provided additional feedback. In v6, I modified the patch based on
> >>> Stephon's comments and made some other changes. Furthermore, I added
> >>> the clock ID
> >>> 144 in v11.
> >>
> >> So how my tag could appear before Cheng-Yu Lee signed off the patch?
> >>
> >
> > Ah, I read the rules stating that "the last Signed-off-by: must always
> > be that of the developer submitting the patch".
> 
> This is correct interpretation (although some subsystems will interpret above
> only in respect of other SoBs).
> 
> >
> > I mistakenly thought my Signed-off-by had to be the absolute last line
> > of
> 
> This is correct.
> 
> > the entire commit message. Therefore, when I inserted your tag at the
> > top of the tag block.
> 
> This is odd result of earlier logic. If your SoB has to be the last, then obvious
> choice is to put the Reviewed-by tag BEFORE your SoB.
> 
> And in any case you should use b4 since it would do the correct thing.
> All patch submissions are supposed to use b4, so you don't make trivial
> process mistakes.
> 

Thank you for the explanation. I'll learn how to use b4.

Just to be sure I get it right: should I keep your tag and move it between
my Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by, or should I drop it?

Also, to make sure I follow the correct process and understand the clock
maintainer's preference: Should I send a v14 to fix the tag, or is it
possible for the clock maintainer to help amend this if there are no other
changes?

Best regards,
Yu-Chun

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.