Re: [PATCH 06/15] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm Kuno NoC
Hardeep Sharma <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/11/2026 6:29 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2026 at 12:57:05PM +0530, Hardeep Sharma wrote: >> Add the Devicetree bindings and node-ID definitions for the RPMh-based >> Network-on-Chip interconnect providers on the Qualcomm Kuno SoC, >> enabling DT validation and interconnect bandwidth voting. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hardeep Sharma <[email protected]> >> --- >> .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,kuno-rpmh.yaml | 72 +++++++++++++++++ >> include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,kuno.h | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+) > Are there no clocks requires for QoS? I've addressed the binding-side follow-up in this v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ qcom,kuno-rpmh.yaml now permits up to 4 QoS AHB clocks (clocks/clock-names: minItems: 1, maxItems: 4) matching sdx75/glymur, so consumers can wire them if they choose. The Kuno DTS itself lands with no clocks= on the interconnect nodes since RPMh BCM covers the paths — same shape as sdx75.