Re: RAID 5 throughputs
[email protected] Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:58:20 -0600
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-config,org.kernel.vger.linux-admin,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yeah, infact it is in a PCI-X slot @66Mhz. On 8/19/06, Justin Piszcz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I have a storage system with 12 Maxtor 7200 rpm 250GB hard drives in > > RAID 5 configuration with one hot spare. Maxtor claims that each drive > > is capable of providing 56 MB/s sustained throughput. My host system > > is connected to it using 64bit ultra320 Adaptec SCSI card. The host > > system has 3.0 GHz pentium 4 (with HT) processor and 4 GB of RAM > > running linux kernel 2.6.9. I was wondering what order of "maximum" > > sequential read/write, random read/write throughput should i expect > > using them. I am using some of the benchmarking tools like Bonnie, > > Bonnie++, tiobench, dd, iometer etc. However the results from them > > have been very depressing. Theoretically i should be able to achieve a > > read sequential throughput close to min(10*56 = 560, 320) = 320 MB/s. > > However my results are no way close to it. I was wondering if anybody > > can give me some insight of what order of practical throughputs i > > should expect using linux and what other factors may be creating > > bottlenecks. > > > > TIA > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > > the body of a message to [email protected] > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > Is your 64bit ultra320 card in a 64bit PCI + 66MHZ slot? > > If not, you will be limited to 133mb/s. > >