Re: [PATCH] kunit: irq: Continue increasing hrtimer interval for longer

Le 04/08/2026 à 02:18, Eric Biggers a écrit :
> Currently, kunit_irq_test_timer_func() stops increasing the hrtimer
> interval as soon as some forward progress is made in each of softirq and
> task context.  Update it to use a more aggressive strategy: increase the
> interval as long as the hrtimer is running significantly faster than
> either context.
> 
> This resolves an occasional hang in the CRC and crypto library tests
> under qemu-system-s390x.  It was exposed by the change in the default
> preemption model on s390 from NONE to LAZY.  That seems to have exposed
> the issue by allowing some forward progress to be made while the actual
> system timer tick is still starved, preventing jiffies from increasing
> or the task context from making much progress towards max_iterations.
> 
> Fixes: 201ceb94aa1d ("kunit: irq: Ensure timer doesn't fire too frequently")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> This patch is targeting libcrypto-next
> 

Thanks. Nothing else is touching this, so taking it through 
libcrypto-next is fine.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>

Cheers,
-- David

>   include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h b/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h
> index bfe60d6cf28d..3802b6fb218e 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h
> @@ -38,11 +38,13 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart kunit_irq_test_timer_func(struct hrtimer *timer)
>   	softirq_calls = atomic_read(&state->softirq_func_calls);
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * If the timer is firing too often for the softirq or task to ever have
> -	 * a chance to run, increase the timer interval.  This is needed on very
> -	 * slow systems.
> +	 * If the hrtimer is running much faster than the bh_work or the task,
> +	 * then it is firing too fast and might be starving those contexts as
> +	 * well as the actual system timer tick.  Increase the interval.
>   	 */
> -	if (hardirq_calls >= 20 && (softirq_calls == 0 || task_calls == 0))
> +	if (hardirq_calls >= 20 &&
> +	    (hardirq_calls / 2 > softirq_calls ||
> +	     hardirq_calls / 2 > task_calls))
>   		state->interval = ktime_add_ns(state->interval, 250);
>   
>   	if (!state->func(state->test_specific_state))
> 
> base-commit: 6d22ec26295c1412d765e3d687e46224fc332928