Re: [PATCH 00/25] ARM: rockchip: Add peripheral support for RV1106
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-phy,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-i2c,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pwm,org.kernel.vger.linux-spi,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:43:16 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 11:35:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:10:51 +0300 Vladislav Leonov wrote: > > > Basic support for the Rockchip RV1106/RV1103 SoCs currently under review. > > > This series builds on top of that and enables the peripherals needed to > > > bring up a board beyond a serial console: > > > > Don't expect maintainers to dig out patches for their subsystems > > from a big series. This is not how upstream development works. > > I see this from time to time and I personally think it's fine to have > these patches together. Also the only the patch that affects my > subsystem was Cc:d to me which is how I like it (but I think opinions > differ on that one, too). > > `b4 am -P _` is great! We have automation and CI systems which ignore anything that isn't scoped to networking to save cost. Not sure if there's a polite way to say this but the smaller the subsystem the more flexibility can be afforded? Let's stick to the existing process, please.