Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate CXL protocol error section length before RAS cap copy

Shuai Xue <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-cxl,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 7/18/26 12:16 AM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> sashiko-bot flagged an out-of-bounds read driven by an unvalidated
> firmware dvsec_len.
> 
> cxl_cper_setup_prot_err_work_data() locates the RAS Capability block at
> prot_err + sizeof(*prot_err) + dvsec_len and copies it, but dvsec_len is
> firmware controlled and never validated.
> 
> Extend cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid() to verify the section can hold the
> header, and that the header, DVSEC and RAS Capability block all fit
> within the reported section length.
> 
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617-topics-ahmtib01-ras_ffh_arm_internal_review-v6-0-91f725174aa0@arm.com?part=6
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/[email protected]/
> Fixes: 315c2f0b53ba ("acpi/ghes, cper: Recognize and cache CXL Protocol errors")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-4-6
> Reviewed-by: Ben Cheatham <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c       |  7 ++++---
>   drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c         |  7 ++++---
>   drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_helpers.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>   include/cxl/event.h              |  4 ++--
>   4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> index 7ad3b36013cc..06a944dadbc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> @@ -165,12 +165,12 @@ static void extlog_print_pcie(struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err,
>   
>   static void
>   extlog_cxl_cper_handle_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err,
> -				int severity)
> +				int severity, u32 len)
>   {
>   #ifdef ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
>   	struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data wd;
>   
> -	if (cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(prot_err))
> +	if (cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(prot_err, len))
>   		return;
>   
>   	if (cxl_cper_setup_prot_err_work_data(&wd, prot_err, severity))
> @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ static int extlog_print(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>   				acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>   
>   			extlog_cxl_cper_handle_prot_err(prot_err,
> -							gdata->error_severity);
> +							gdata->error_severity,
> +							gdata->error_data_length);
>   		} else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
>   			struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index a752e152a5a0..17e4ef555292 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -753,12 +753,12 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cxl_cper_prot_err_work_lock);
>   struct work_struct *cxl_cper_prot_err_work;
>   
>   static void cxl_cper_post_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err,
> -				   int severity)
> +				   int severity, u32 len)
>   {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
>   	struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data wd;
>   
> -	if (cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(prot_err))
> +	if (cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(prot_err, len))
>   		return;
>   
>   	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work_lock);
> @@ -950,7 +950,8 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>   		} else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_CXL_PROT_ERR)) {
>   			struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>   
> -			cxl_cper_post_prot_err(prot_err, gdata->error_severity);
> +			cxl_cper_post_prot_err(prot_err, gdata->error_severity,
> +					       gdata->error_data_length);
>   		} else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_CXL_GEN_MEDIA_GUID)) {
>   			struct cxl_cper_event_rec *rec = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_helpers.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_helpers.c
> index bc7111b740af..d625ec98a24c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_helpers.c
> @@ -5,8 +5,15 @@
>   #include <linux/aer.h>
>   #include <cxl/event.h>
>   
> -int cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err)
> +int cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err, u32 len)
>   {
> +	if (len < sizeof(*prot_err)) {
> +		pr_err_ratelimited(FW_WARN
> +				   "CXL CPER prot err section too small (%u)\n",
> +				   len);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (!(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_AGENT_ADDRESS)) {
>   		pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER invalid agent type\n");
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -23,6 +30,18 @@ int cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * The RAS Capability block follows a firmware-controlled DVSEC of
> +	 * dvsec_len bytes; verify it and the header fit the section.
> +	 */
> +	if (sizeof(*prot_err) + prot_err->dvsec_len +
> +	    sizeof(struct cxl_ras_capability_regs) > len) {
> +		pr_err_ratelimited(FW_WARN
> +				   "CXL CPER prot err section too small (%u)\n",
> +				   len);

Nit, this prints the same message as the header-too-small case above, so
the log can't tell them apart. Maybe include dvsec_len here.

Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <[email protected]>

Thanks.
Shuai
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.