Re: drgn 0.0.30 and libkdumpfile 0.5.5 incompatibility in Arch
Stephen Brennan <[email protected]> Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:31:59 -0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-debuggers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen Brennan <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Christian, > > I think you may already be aware of this, but I wanted to let you know > that there's an incompatibility with drgn 0.0.30-2 and libkdumpfile > 0.5.5-1 on Arch. libkdumpfile 0.5.5 changed some APIs in a > backward-incompatible way. Building drgn against the new version fails, > and running a version built against 0.5.4 of course fails due to the > soname change. The current drgn 0.0.30-2 on Arch's repositories was > built against 0.5.4. > > Thus a user installing drgn & libkdumpfile on Arch, who is fully > up-to-date, gets this: > > ImportError: libkdumpfile.so.10: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > The incompatibility is fixed in drgn's main branch by the changes in > [1]. Unfortunately, that was merged after drgn 0.0.30 was released. > Some major changes have been merged since then, so I don't think a > 0.0.31 release is likely for a few months. So I think it may be a good > idea to carry the two commits in [1] as downstream patches in a new > 0.0.30-3 release. I'd be happy to implement those changes if it'd help. > > I'm Ccing the linux-debuggers mailing list for posterity, as well as > Omar and Petr as an FYI. > > Thanks, > Stephen > > [1]: https://github.com/osandov/drgn/pull/452 Sorry, I was a bit mistaken here: 1. drgn 0.0.30 DOES build successfully with libkdumpfile 0.5.5. I misread the changes there. As far as I can tell, there may be a small memory leak when using 0.0.30 with 0.5.5, but nothing major. 2. I'd say the best way forward would be a simple rebuild of drgn against libkdumpfile 0.5.5. Thanks, Stephen