Re: [PATCH] mm: Convert memory block states (MEM_*) macros to enum

On 10/27/25 16:46, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:

> 
> So why are we naming the type... does drgn require it?
> 

It doesn't need to be named, but as David pointed out, we could find
where these values are being used and replace the type with the proper
enum. I quickly grepped the codebase and it seems doable, I'm probably
adding these changes to the next version of this patch since there are
some things to fix anyway.