Re: [PATCH] mm: Convert memory block states (MEM_*) macros to enum

On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 11:53:57PM +0000, Israel Batista wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/25 16:46, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>
> >
> > So why are we naming the type... does drgn require it?
> >
>
> It doesn't need to be named, but as David pointed out, we could find
> where these values are being used and replace the type with the proper
> enum. I quickly grepped the codebase and it seems doable, I'm probably
> adding these changes to the next version of this patch since there are
> some things to fix anyway.

I mean we're getting a little out of scope here but fine, if these are not
in fact used as flags, I don't mind, just remove the silly 1 << x values
while you do it.